Cited by 41Psychology of Development and EducationChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individuality, Context, and the Search for Meaning

Emde, Robert N.·1994·Child Development

Abstract

A developmental systems approach incorporates clinical perspectives and offers a background for thinking about some of the ways we do research. Recent advances reveal both research opportunities and needs related to fostering child development in a pluralistic, democratic society. 4 topics are addressed that deal with individuality, context, and the search for meaning. First, individuality is discussed wherein our abstract thinking and our quantitative individual differences methods have revealed an urgent need to study the developing person. Second, classification is considered wherein our systematizing efforts reveal a need to understand the interplay among classified features of the person, as well as the particular methods that underlie our classifications. Third, the experiencing of development is discussed, wherein recent advances have revealed new ways of thinking about an individual's nonconscious--procedural and practicing--activities in development, as well as those activities that are conscious. Fourth, the issue of values is considered. Values contribute to our doing research, and we also need to acknowledge their importance as the object of developmental study in 4 children. The appreciation of context, of multiple windows of observation, and of our emotional "centeredness" as human beings who communicate and cooperate with others are crosscutting themes of the essay.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1131414

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents of identical twins are expected to support two children who share developmental milestones simultaneously, unlike parents of siblings with age differences, who have greater flexibility to attune to developmental variability.

    “Parents are expected to support two children who share developmental milestones simultaneously, unlike parents of siblings with age differences, who have greater flexibility to attune to developmental variability (Bacon, 2006;Emde, 1994;Harris, 2006;Pietilä et al., 2013).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Emde, R. N.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Emde, Robert N.
Venue
Child Development
Published
1994-06
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
719
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991278592
Cited by
41
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH MH22803, NIMH 5K02 MH36808)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
individuality, context, meaning, classification, individual differences, procedural learning, values in research, plural society, clinical perspective
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Psychology, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review