Cited by 209Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Peer Relations and the Understanding of Faux Pas: Longitudinal Evidence for Bidirectional Associations

Open access
Banerjee, Robin, Watling, Dawn, Caputi, Marcella·2011·Child Development

Abstract

Research connecting children’s understanding of mental states to their peer relations at school remains scarce. Previous work by the authors demonstrated that children’s understanding of mental states in the context of a faux pas—a social blunder involving unintentional insult—is associated with concurrent peer rejection. The present report describes a longitudinal follow-up investigation of 210 children from the original sample, aged 5–6 or 8–9 years at Time 1. The results support a bidirectional model suggesting that peer rejection may impair the acquisition of faux pas understanding, and also that, among older children, difficulties in understanding faux pas predict increased peer rejection. These findings highlight the important and complex associations between social understanding and peer relations during childhood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01669.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-sectional studies have shown age-related change in theory of mind ability in middle childhood and early adolescence.

    “a number of cross-sectional studies have shown age-related change in ToM ability in middle childhood and early adolescence (Banerjee et al., 2011; Devine et al., 2023; Osterhaus et al., 2016; Peterson & Wellman, 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banerjee, R., Watling, D., & Caputi, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
Corresponding author
Banerjee, Robin
Venue
Child Development
Published
2011-11-01
Volume
82
Issue
6
Pages
1887-1905
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2147928258
Cited by
209
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • Royal Holloway Digital Repository (Royal Holloway University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
faux pas, theory of mind, peer rejection, peer relationships, social understanding, bidirectional relationship, children, longitudinal development
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Peer Group, Social Behavior, Socialization, Sociometric Techniques, Vocabulary, Comprehension, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review