Cited by 165AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningSpeech and dialogue systemsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A basic agent

Vere, Steven, Bickmore, Timothy·1990·Computational Intelligence

Abstract

A basic agent has been constructed which integrates limited natural language understanding and generation, temporal planning and reasoning, plan execution, simulated symbolic perception, episodic memory, and some general world knowledge. The agent is cast as a robot submarine operating in a two‐dimensional simulated “Seaworld” about which it has only partial knowledge. It can communicate with people in a vocabulary of about 800 common English words using a medium coverage grammar. The agent maintains an episodic memory of events in its life and has a limited ability to reflect on those events. A person can make statements to the agent, ask it questions, and give it commands. In response to commands, a temporal task planner is invoked to synthesize a plan, which is then executed at an appropriate future time. A large variety of temporal references in natural language are interpreted with respect to agent time. The agent can form and retain compound future plans, and replan in response to new information or new commands. Natural language verbs are represented in a state transition semantics for compatibility with the planner. The agent is able to give terse answers to questions about its past experiences, present activities and perceptions, future intentions, and general knowledge. No other artificial intelligence artifact with this range of capabilities has previously been constructed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8640.1990.tb00128.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Allen J.F., 1987, Natural language understanding
  2. Asimov I., 1950, I. Robot
  3. Azar B.S., 1984, Basic English grammar
  4. Bickmore T.W.1988.An object‐oriented approach to tactical text generation. Lockheed AI Center Technical Report Palo Alto CA. · DOI
  5. Borchardt G.C.1984.A computer model for the representation and identification of physical events.M.S. thesis Computer Science Department University of Illinois at Urbana‐ Champaign IL .
  6. Cercone N. andSchubert L.1975.Toward a state based conceptual representation. Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Tbilisi U.S.S.R. pp.88–90.
  7. Cermak L.S., 1982, Human memory and amnesia
  8. 10.1007/978-94-009-3645-4_14 · DOI
  9. Haley V.B., 1977, International English
  10. Jackendoff R., 1983, Semantics and cognition
  11. 10.1007/978-94-015-7668-0_1 · DOI
  12. Kibler D. andMorris P.1981.Don't be stupid. Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Vancouver B.C. pp.345–347.
  13. Kolodner J.L., 1984, Artificial and human intelligence, 57
  14. 10.1017/CBO9780511620751 · DOI
  15. McKevitt P. andWilks Y.1987.Transfer semantics in an operating system consultant: the formalization of actions involving object transfer. Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Milan Italy pp.569–575.
  16. 10.4159/harvard.9780674421288 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/0003-066X.33.10.906 · DOI
  18. Neumann B., 1984, Fachbereich Informatik
  19. 10.1609/aimag.v4i4.411 · DOI
  20. Ogden C.K., 1934, The system of basic English
  21. 10.1609/aimag.v4i1.382 · DOI
  22. Schank R.C, 1981, Inside computer understanding: five programs plus miniatures
  23. Teitelman W.1972.Automated programmering[sic] – the programmer's assistant. Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference pp.917–921.
  24. Tulving E., 1972, Organization of memory, 381
  25. Vere S.A.1985a.Splicing plans to achieve misordered goals. Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Los Angeles CA pp.1016–1021.
  26. Vere S.A.1985b.Temporal scope of assertions and window cutoff. Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Los Angeles CA pp.1055–1059.
  27. Vere S.A., 1987, Encyclopedia of AI, 748
  28. Waltz D.L.1981.Toward a detailed model of processing for language describing the physical world. Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Vancouver B.C. pp.1–6.
  29. Waltz D.L., 1982, Strategies for natural language processing, 3
  30. Wilensky R., 1983, Planning and understanding
  31. Wilensky R., 1986, Some problems and proposals for knowledge representation
  32. 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90002-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Vere, S., & Bickmore, T.
Affiliations
Lockheed (United States) (US)
Venue
Computational Intelligence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
41-60
ISSN
  • 0824-7935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8640
OpenAlex
W2155538387
Cited by
165
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
18.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computational Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Keywords
natural language understanding, natural language generation, temporal planning, temporal reasoning, plan execution, episodic memory, symbolic perception, world knowledge, temporal reference, replanning, question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A basic agent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1990.tb00128.x
The paper
Vere, S., & Bickmore, T. (1990). A basic agent. Computational Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1990.tb00128.x