The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A LOGIC OF ARGUMENTATION FOR REASONING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
Abstract
We present the syntax and proof theory of a logic of argumentation, LA. We also outline the development of a category theoretic semantics for LA. LA is the core of a proof theoretic model for reasoning under uncertainty. In this logic, propositions are labeled with a representation of the arguments which support their validity. Arguments may then be aggregated to collect more information about the potential validity of the propositions of interest. We make the notion of aggregation primitive to the logic, and then define strength mappings from sets of arguments to one of a number of possible dictionaries. This provides a uniform framework which incorporates a number of numerical and symbolic techniques for assigning subjective confidences to propositions on the basis of their supporting arguments. These aggregation techniques are also described with examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Cited by
Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing
Parsons, S. (1998) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/8.3.261 · Cited by 656
Metadata
- Authors
- Krause, P., Ambler, S., Elvang‐Goransson, M., & Fox, J.
- Venue
- Computational Intelligence
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-131
- ISSN
- 0824-7935 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8640
- OpenAlex
- W2105953471
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A LOGIC OF ARGUMENTATION FOR REASONING UNDER UNCERTAINTY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1995.tb00025.x
- The paper
- Krause, P., Ambler, S., Elvang‐Goransson, M., & Fox, J. (1995). A LOGIC OF ARGUMENTATION FOR REASONING UNDER UNCERTAINTY. Computational Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1995.tb00025.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
