The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ON MULTI‐CLASS COST‐SENSITIVE LEARNING
Abstract
Rescaling is possibly the most popular approach to cost‐sensitive learning. This approach works by rebalancing the classes according to their costs, and it can be realized in different ways, for example, re‐weighting or resampling the training examples in proportion to their costs, moving the decision boundaries of classifiers faraway from high‐cost classes in proportion to costs, etc. This approach is very effective in dealing with two‐class problems, yet some studies showed that it is often not so helpful on multi‐class problems. In this article, we try to explore why the rescaling approach is often helpless on multi‐class problems. Our analysis discloses that the rescaling approach works well when the costs are consistent, while directly applying it to multi‐class problems with inconsistent costs may not be a good choice. Based on this recognition, we advocate that before applying the rescaling approach, the consistency of the costs must be examined at first. If the costs are consistent, the rescaling approach can be conducted directly; otherwise it is better to apply rescaling after decomposing the multi‐class problem into a series of two‐class problems. An empirical study involving 20 multi‐class data sets and seven types of cost‐sensitive learners validates our proposal. Moreover, we show that the proposal is also helpful for class‐imbalance learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
A Simple Generalisation of the Area Under the ROC Curve for Multiple Class Classification Problems
Hand, D. J., & Till, R. J. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010920819831 · Cited by 2,276
Mining with rarity: a unifying framework
Weiss, G. M. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007734 · Cited by 1,393
Cited by
He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.239 · Cited by 10,359
Learning from imbalanced data: open challenges and future directions
Krawczyk, B. (2016) · Progress in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s13748-016-0094-0 · Cited by 2,459
Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets
Fernández, A., García, S., Galar, M., Prati, R. C., Krawczyk, B., & Herrera, F. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98074-4 · Cited by 1,349
Learning a Unified Classifier Incrementally via Rebalancing
Hou, S., Pan, X., Loy, C. C., Wang, Z., & Lin, D. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00092 · Cited by 1,195
Multiclass Imbalance Problems: Analysis and Potential Solutions
Wang, S., & Yao, X. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2012.2187280 · Cited by 567
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ON MULTI‐CLASS COST‐SENSITIVE LEARNING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2010.00358.x
- The paper
- Zhou, Z., & Liu, X. (2010). ON MULTI‐CLASS COST‐SENSITIVE LEARNING. Computational Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2010.00358.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.