Cited by 394Computer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising MethodsDigital Image Processing Techniques

Fast High‐Dimensional Filtering Using the Permutohedral Lattice

Adams, Andrew, Baek, Jongmin, Davis, Myers Abraham·2010·Computer Graphics Forum

Abstract

Many useful algorithms for processing images and geometry fall under the general framework of high‐dimensional Gaussian filtering. This family of algorithms includes bilateral filtering and non‐local means. We propose a new way to perform such filters using the permutohedral lattice, which tessellates high‐dimensional space with uniform simplices. Our algorithm is the first implementation of a high‐dimensional Gaussian filter that is both linear in input size and polynomial in dimensionality. Furthermore it is parameter‐free, apart from the filter size, and achieves a consistently high accuracy relative to ground truth (> 45 dB). We use this to demonstrate a number of interactive‐rate applications of filters in as high as eight dimensions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01645.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In CRF-RNN, pair-wise potentials are limited to weighted Gaussians and not all parameters are trainable due to the Permutohedral lattice implementation.

    “However, the pair-wise potentials in [50] are limited to weighted Gaussians and not all the parameters are trainable due to the Permutohedral lattice implementation [51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, A., Baek, J., & Davis, M. A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Computer Graphics Forum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
753-762
ISSN
  • 0167-7055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8659
OpenAlex
W1964772475
Cited by
394
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
38.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Graphics Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
bilateral filter, non-local means, simplices, image filtering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review