The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mixed Finite Elements for Variational Surface Modeling
Abstract
Many problems in geometric modeling can be described using variational formulations that define the smoothness of the shape and its behavior w.r.t. the posed modeling constraints. For example, high‐quality C2 surfaces that obey boundary conditions on positions, tangents and curvatures can be conveniently defined as solutions of high‐order geometric PDEs; the advantage of such a formulation is its conceptual representation‐independence. In practice, solving high‐order problems efficiently and accurately for surfaces approximated by meshes is notoriously difficult. For modeling applications, the preferred approach is to use discrete geometric schemes which are efficient and robust, but their convergence properties are less well understood compared to higher‐order FEM. In this paper, we explore discretizations of common geometric PDEs on meshes using mixed finite elements, where additional variables for the derivatives in the problem are introduced. Such formulations use first‐order derivatives only, allowing a discretization with simple linear elements. Various boundary conditions can be naturally discretized in this setting. We formalize continuous region constraints commonly used in modeling applications, and show that these seamlessly fit into the mixed framework. We demonstrate that some of the commonly used discrete geometric discretizations can be regarded as a particular case of mixed finite elements. We study the convergence behavior of our discretizations, and how they…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1007/s002110100284 · DOI
- Bramble J., 1985, A mixed‐Lagrange multiplier finite element method for the polyharmonic equation, Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 19, 519, 10.1051/m2an/1985190405191 · DOI
- Brezzi F., 1991, Mixed and hybrid finite element methods, volume 15 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2
- 10.1145/1015706.1015772 · DOI · Paper page
- Braess D., 2002, Finite Elements: Theory, fast solvers and applications in solid mechanics, 2nd edn, 13
- 10.1109/TVCG.2007.1054 · DOI
- 10.1016/0010-4485(90)90049-I · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cagd.2004.02.004 · DOI
- CelnikerG. GossardD.:Deformable curve and surface finite‐elements for free‐form shape design. InProceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH(1991) pp.257–266. · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-2024(08)70178-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-208350-1.50009-1 · DOI
- 10.4171/IFB/134 · DOI
- DziukG.:Finite elements for the Beltrami operator on arbitrary surfaces.Partial differential equations and calculus of variations(1988) 142–155. · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01385643 · DOI
- 10.1137/0715036 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2006.00974.x · DOI
- Meyer M., 2002, Discrete differential‐geometry operators for triangulated 2‐manifolds, Visualization and mathematics, 3, 35
- 10.1137/0724048 · DOI
- MoretonH. P. SéquinC. H.:Functional optimization for fair surface design. InProceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH(1992) pp.167–176. · DOI
- 10.1145/1276377.1276429 · DOI
- 10.1080/10586458.1993.10504266 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cag.2009.03.005 · DOI
- Scholz R., 1978, A mixed method for 4th order problems using linear finite elements, RAIRO Anal. Numér., 12, 85, 10.1051/m2an/1978120100851 · DOI
- SchneiderR. KobbeltL.:Generating fair meshes withG1boundary conditions. InGeometric Modeling and Processing Conference Proceedings(2000). · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-8396(01)00036-X · DOI
- TaubinG.:A signal processing approach to fair surface design. InProceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH(1995) pp.351–358. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cagd.2007.07.006 · DOI
- WelchW. WitkinA.:Free‐form shape design using triangulated surfaces. InProceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH(1994) pp.247–256. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cagd.2005.05.004 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bounded biharmonic weights for real-time deformation
Jacobson, A., Baran, I., Popović, J., & Sorkine, O. (2011) · ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 papers · doi:10.1145/1964921.1964973 · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobson, A., Tosun, E., Sorkine, O., & Zorin, D.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Venue
- Computer Graphics Forum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1565-1574
- ISSN
- 0167-7055 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8659
- OpenAlex
- W1986919206
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Graphics Forum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Keywords
- mixed finite element method, convergence analysis, surface meshes, linear elements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review