Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Survey of Ocean Simulation and Rendering Techniques in Computer Graphics

Darles, E., Crespin, B., Ghazanfarpour, D., Gonzato, J.C.·2011·Computer Graphics Forum
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2010.01828.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper presents a survey of ocean simulation and rendering methods in computer graphics. To model and animate the ocean’s surface, these methods mainly rely on two main approaches: on the one hand, those which approximate ocean dynamics with parametric, spectral or hybrid models and use empirical laws from oceanographic research. We will see that this type of methods essentially allows the simulation of ocean scenes in the deep water domain, without breaking waves. On the other hand, physically‐based methods use Navier–Stokes equations to represent breaking waves and more generally ocean surface near the shore. We also describe ocean rendering methods in computer graphics, with a special interest in the simulation of phenomena such as foam and spray, and light’s interaction with the ocean surface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2010.01828.x

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Arvo J., 1986, ACM SIGGRAPH ’86 Course Notes ‐ Developments in Ray Tracing, 259
  2. Baboud L., 2006, Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Natural Phenomena
  3. Belyaev V., 2003, GraphiCon‐2003, Conference Proceedings, 131
  4. Becker M., 2007, SCA ’07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 209
  5. Chou C.‐T., 2007, Proceedings of the CACS International Conference
  6. CieutatJ.‐M. GonzatoJ.‐C. GuittonP.:A general ocean waves model for ship design. In Virtual Concept Conference Proceedings( Biarritz France 2003) pp.187–194.
  7. Cui X., 2004, Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry, 332
  8. Desbrun M., 1996, Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Computer Animation and Simulation (EGCAS), 61
  9. Desbrun M., 1999, Space‐Time Adaptive Simulation of Highly Deformable Substances
  10. Darles E., 2007, Proceedings of the WSCG
  11. Foster N., 2001, Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH, 23
  12. Finch M., 2004, In GPU Gems: Programming Techniques, Tips, and Tricks for Real‐Time Graphics, 5
  13. Foster N., 1997, In CGI '97, Conference Proceedings, 178
  14. Fournier A., 1986, Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH, 75
  15. Frechot J., 2006, Proceedings of the GRAPP, 76
  16. Gonzato J.‐C., 1999, Proceedings of the WSCG, 93
  17. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1778(200002)11:1<27::AID-VIS214>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  18. Heckbert P., 1984, Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH, 119
  19. Iwasaki K., 2003, Proceedings of the Workshop on Volume Graphics, 129
  20. Isidoro J., 2002, In Direct3D ShaderX: Vertex and Pixel Shader Tips and Tricks
  21. Jeschke S., 2003, Proceedings of the WSCG
  22. JensenL. GoliasR.:Deep‐water animation and rendering InProceedings of the Game Developper's Conference Europe '01 2001. Available at:http://www.gamasutra.com/gdce/jensen/jensen_01.htm
  23. Jerlov N., 1974, Optical Aspects of Oceanography
  24. Johanson C., 2004, Real‐Time Water Rendering ‐ Introducing the Projected Grid Concept
  25. Kim J., 2006, SCA ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 335
  26. Lachman L., 2007, Proceedings of the IMAGE Conference
  27. Lee N., 2007, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science, 122
  28. Max N., 1981, Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH, 317
  29. Müller M., 2003, SCA ’03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 154
  30. Mitchell J., 2005, Real‐Time Synthesis and Rendering of Ocean Water
  31. Munk W., 1947, A critical wind speed for air‐sea boundary processes, Journal of Marine Research, 6, 203
  32. Perez‐Cazorla F., 1997, Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering
  33. Pierson W., 1964, A proposed spectral form for fully developed wind seas based on similarity theory of s.a kilaigorodskii, Journal of Geophysical Research, 5281
  34. Reeves W., 1983, Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH, 359
  35. Robine M., 2006, Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP), 223
  36. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19981030)43:4<607::AID-NME399>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  37. Stora D., 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Graphics Interface '99, 203
  38. Salgado A., 2007, Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing (SIBGRAPI)
  39. Schachter B., 1980, Long crested wave models, CGIP, 12, 187
  40. Stam J., 1995, Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH, 129
  41. Schneider J., 2001, VMV ’01: Proceedings of the Vision Modeling and Visualization Conference 2001, 211
  42. Tessendorf J., 2001, SIGGRAPH course Notes (Course 47)
  43. Thon S., 2001, Proceedings of the Eurographics, UK, 53
  44. Tonnesen D., 1991, Proceedings of the Graphics Interface, 255
  45. Terzopoulos D., 1989, Proceedings of the Graphics Interface, 219
  46. Thürey N., 2006, SCA ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 157
  47. Thürey N., 2007, SCA ’07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 191
  48. Wan H., 2006, Proceedings of the Edutainment, 1058
  49. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19990630)30:4<407::AID-FLD846>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  50. Zheng W., 2006, SCA ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 325

Metadata

Authors
Darles, E., Crespin, B., Ghazanfarpour, D., & Gonzato, J. C.
Venue
Computer Graphics Forum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-13
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
43-60
ISSN
  • 0167-7055
  • 1467-8659
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-8659.2010.01828.x
Cited by
49
References
70
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.