The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Analysis of Large Graphs: State‐of‐the‐Art and Future Research Challenges
Open accessAbstract
The analysis of large graphs plays a prominent role in various fields of research and is relevant in many important application areas. Effective visual analysis of graphs requires appropriate visual presentations in combination with respective user interaction facilities and algorithmic graph analysis methods. How to design appropriate graph analysis systems depends on many factors, including the type of graph describing the data, the analytical task at hand and the applicability of graph analysis methods. The most recent surveys of graph visualization and navigation techniques cover techniques that had been introduced until 2000 or concentrate only on graph layouts published until 2002. Recently, new techniques have been developed covering a broader range of graph types, such as time‐varying graphs. Also, in accordance with ever growing amounts of graph‐structured data becoming available, the inclusion of algorithmic graph analysis and interaction techniques becomes increasingly important. In this State‐of‐the‐Art Report, we survey available techniques for the visual analysis of large graphs. Our review first considers graph visualization techniques according to the type of graphs supported. The visualization techniques form the basis for the presentation of interaction approaches suitable for visual graph exploration. As an important component of visual graph analysis, we discuss various graph algorithmic aspects useful for the different stages of the visual graph analysis process. We also present main open research challenges in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806452 · Cited by 1,244
Cited by
Evolview v3: a webserver for visualization, annotation, and management of phylogenetic trees
Subramanian, B., Gao, S., Lercher, M. J., Hu, S., & Chen, W.-H. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz357 · Cited by 1,013
Visualization of Eye Tracking Data: A Taxonomy and Survey
Blascheck, T., Kurzhals, K., Raschke, M., Burch, M., Weiskopf, D., & Ertl, T. (2017) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.13079 · Cited by 285
iVUN: interactive Visualization of Uncertain biochemical reaction Networks
Vehlow, C., Hasenauer, J., Kramer, A., Raue, A., Hug, S., Timmer, J., Radde, N., Theis, F. J., & Weiskopf, D. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-s19-s2 · Cited by 11
DG Comics: Semi-Automatically Authoring Graph Comics for Dynamic Graphs
Kim, J., Lee, H., Nguyen, D. M., Shin, M., Kwon, B. C., Ko, S., & Elmqvist, N. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3456340 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- von Landesberger, T., Kuijper, A., Schreck, T., Kohlhammer, J., van Wijk, J. J., Fekete, J. ‐., & Fellner, D. W.
- Venue
- Computer Graphics Forum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-21
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1719-1749
- ISSN
- 0167-7055 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8659
- OpenAlex
- W2158453355
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual Analysis of Large Graphs: State‐of‐the‐Art and Future Research Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01898.x
- The paper
- von Landesberger, T., Kuijper, A., Schreck, T., Kohlhammer, J., van Wijk, J. J., Fekete, J. ‐., & Fellner, D. W. (2011). Visual Analysis of Large Graphs: State‐of‐the‐Art and Future Research Challenges. Computer Graphics Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01898.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.