The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bourdieu's Disavowal of Lacan: Psychoanalytic Theory and the Concepts of “Habitus” and “Symbolic Capital”
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bourdieu's theory of the subject is not only completely compatible with psychoanalysis but can profit from a rethinking along Freudian and Lacanian lines (Steinmetz, 2006).”
From Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology (2011) · cites this paper as Steinmetz, 2006
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology
Steinmetz, G. (2011) · Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1177/1749975510389912 · Cited by 156
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinmetz, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Steinmetz, George
- ORCID
- Steinmetz, George
- Venue
- Constellations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 445-464
- ISSN
- 1351-0487 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8675
- OpenAlex
- W2018640204
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Constellations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
- Keywords
- Pierre Bourdieu, Jacques Lacan, habitus, symbolic capital, psychoanalytic theory, structuralism, psychoanalysis and sociology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
