The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Strategic Role of the Board: The Impact of Board Structure on Top Management Team Strategic Action Capability
Abstract
Manuscript Type:Conceptual Research Question/Issue:Board reforms around the globe, corporate governance failures, and equivocal research findings provide the impetus for studying boards from a perspective different from the current emphasis on control and service roles. A board's strategic role is conceptualized and the impact of board diversity and leadership structure on the speed and breadth of top management team (TMT) strategic capabilities is explicated. Research Findings/Insights:Four board configurations are identified by examining the joint impact of diversity and leadership. Each configuration differentially influences TMT strategic action capabilities. We then propose that the nature of the competitive environment (dynamism and complexity) impacts the effectiveness of a particular configuration. Testable propositions applicable in communitarian, Anglo‐Saxon, and emerging markets are developed in a manner that leverages current theoretical insights and empirical findings. Theoretical/Academic Implications:Theorizing that board strategic control manifests in multiple forms and influences TMT strategic capabilities in nuanced ways highlights how particular board configurations differentially impact firm processes and outcomes. This approach links the board, TMT, and competitive rivalry literatures, providing a potential explanation for mixed research findings, and suggests directions for future research. Practitioner/Policy Implications:Universally prescribed board configurations may be harmful to firm and industry performance as well as national economies. Specific board configurations differentially impact TMT capabilities and should be properly aligned with environmental contexts. Those charged with governance design and board configuration should be cognizant of how the diversity and leadership of strategically involved boards influences the speed and breadth of TMT strategic action capabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to cybernetics
Ashby, W. R. (1956) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.5851 · Cited by 7,578
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217 · Cited by 3,413
Strategy‐making and environment: The third link
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250040304 · Cited by 1,986
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255859 · Cited by 682
Cited by
Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2302-9 · Cited by 536
Board gender diversity and firm performance: The UK evidence
Brahma, S., Nwafor, C., & Boateng, A. (2021) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.2089 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, B., Burns, M. L., & Prescott, J. E.
- Venue
- Corporate Governance: An International Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 728-743
- ISSN
- 0964-8410 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8683
- OpenAlex
- W2127049838
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 20.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Strategic Role of the Board: The Impact of Board Structure on Top Management Team Strategic Action Capability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00775.x
- The paper
- Kim, B., Burns, M. L., & Prescott, J. E. (2009). The Strategic Role of the Board: The Impact of Board Structure on Top Management Team Strategic Action Capability. Corporate Governance: An International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00775.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.