Cited by 12Innovation and Knowledge ManagementQuality and Supply ManagementService and Product Innovation

Continuous Improvement and Collaborative Improvement: Similarities and Differences

Open access
Middel, Rick, Boer, Harry, Fisscher, Olaf·2006·Creativity and Innovation Management

Abstract

A substantial body of theoretical and practical knowledge has been developed on continuous improvement. However, there is still a considerable lack of empirically grounded contributions and theories on collaborative improvement, that is, continuous improvement in an inter‐organizational setting. The CO‐IMPROVE project investigated whether and how the concept of continuous improvement can be extended and transferred to such settings. The objective of this article is to evaluate the CO‐IMPROVE research findings in view of existing theories on continuous innovation. The article investigates the similarities and differences between key components of continuous and collaborative improvement by assessing what is specific for continuous improvement, what for collaborative improvement, and where the two areas of application meet and overlap. The main conclusions are that there are many more similarities between continuous and collaborative improvement. The main differences relate to the role of hierarchy/market, trust, power and commitment to collaboration, all of which are related to differences between the settings in which continuous and collaborative improvement unfold.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00407.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trust acts as a facilitator and promotes interpersonal relationships prompting people to seek and give help leading to a more collaborative culture.

    “Trust acts as a facilitator and promotes interpersonal relationships prompting people to seek and give help leading to a more collaborative culture (Russ et al., 1998;Abrams et al., 2003;Middel, Boer & Fisscher, 2006).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Middel, R., Boer, H., & Fisscher, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • University of Stavanger (NO)
Venue
Creativity and Innovation Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-29
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
338-347
ISSN
  • 0963-1690 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8691
OpenAlex
W2149106049
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Creativity and Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
continuous improvement, collaborative improvement, inter-organizational collaboration, continuous innovation, trust, power, market versus hierarchy, organizational learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review