The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction
Abstract
Our research examined the effects of hands-free cell-phone conversations on simulated driving. We found that even when participants looked directly at objects in the driving environment, they were less likely to create a durable memory of those objects if they were conversing on a cell phone. This pattern was obtained for objects of both high and low relevance, suggesting that very little semantic analysis of the objects occurs outside the restricted focus of attention. Moreover, in-vehicle conversations do not interfere with driving as much as cell-phone conversations do, because drivers are better able to synchronize the processing demands of driving with in-vehicle conversations than with cell-phone conversations. Together, these data support an inattention-blindness interpretation wherein the disruptive effects of cell-phone conversations on driving are due in large part to the diversion of attention from driving to the phone conversation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone
Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00386 · Cited by 1,134
Self-citation
Cited by
Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone
Hyman, I. E., Boss, S. M., Wise, B. M., McKenzie, K. E., & Caggiano, J. M. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1638 · Cited by 438
Misra (2016) · doi:10.1177/0013916514539755 · Cited by 430
Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading
Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Gendron, M. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.024 · Cited by 411
Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving.
Drews, F. A., Pasupathi, M., & Strayer, D. L. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0013119 · Cited by 336
Self-citationThornton, B., Faires, A., Robbins, M., & Rollins, E. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000216 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Strayer, D. L., & Drews, F. A.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 128-131
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2118166874
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00489.x
- The paper
- Strayer, D. L., & Drews, F. A. (2007). Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00489.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.