Sound, Presence, and Power: “Student Voice” in Educational Research and Reform
Abstract
Every way of thinking is both premised on and generative of a way of naming that reflects particular underlying convictions. Over the last 15 years, a way of thinking has reemerged that strives to reposition students in educational research and reform. Best documented in Australia, Canada, England, and the United States, this way of thinking is premised on the following convictions: that young people have unique perspectives on learning, teaching, and schooling; that their insights warrant not only the attention but also the responses of adults; and that they should be afforded opportunities to actively shape their education. Although these convictions mean different things to different people and take different forms in practice, a single term has emerged to capture a range of activities that strive to reposition students in educational research and reform: “student voice.” In this discussion the author explores the emergence of the term “student voice,” identifies underlying premises signaled by two particular words associated with the term, “rights” and “respect,” and explores the many meanings of a word that surfaces repeatedly across discussions of student voice efforts but refers to a wide range of practices: “listening.” The author offers this discussion not as an exhaustive or definitive analysis but rather with the goal of looking across discussions of work that advocates, enacts, and critically analyzes the term “student voice.”
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Institute-level partnership schemes enhance student engagement and alter the established culture to provide more credence to the student voice.
“There is compelling evidence suggesting that institute-level partnership schemes enhance student engagement and alter the established culture to provide more credence to the student voice (Cook-Sather, 2006; Cook-Sather, 2011).”
From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Cook-Sather, 2006
Cites
Authorizing Students’ Perspectives: Toward Trust, Dialogue, and Change in Education
Cook-Sather, A. (2002) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x031004003 · Cited by 959 · cited 7× · see citing works
“Long-standing assumptions and structures must be dismantled to shift the culture and practices of schools (Cook-Sather, 2002b; Fullan, 1991; Oldfather, 1995; Rudduck, 2002, in press).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation'Squeaky Wheels and Flat Tires': a case study of students as reform participants
Silva, E. (2001) · FORUM · doi:10.2304/forum.2001.43.2.15 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mager, U., & Nowak, P. (2012) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.001 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Improving student wellbeing: having a say at school
Anderson, D. L., & Graham, A. P. (2016) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1084336 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Nonacademic effects of homework in privileged, high-performing high schools
Galloway, M., Conner, J., & Pope, D. (2013) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.745469 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
A theoretical understanding of the literature on student voice in the science classroom
Laux, K. (2018) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1353963 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Mandatory voice: Implementation of a district‐led student‐voice program in urban high schools
Giraldo‐García, R. J., Voight, A., & O'Malley, M. (2021) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22436 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Cultures of engagement in challenging circumstances: Four Lebanese primary schools in urban Beirut
Nabhani, M., Busher, H., & Bahous, R. (2012) · School Leadership & Management · doi:10.1080/13632434.2011.642353 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Assessment design through co-creation
Williams, A., & Ingle, E. (2025) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5802 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cook-Sather, A.
- Affiliations
- Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr, PA, USA
- Venue
- Curriculum Inquiry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-390
- ISSN
- 0362-6784 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-873X
- OpenAlex
- W2011380194
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 72 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 30.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Curriculum Inquiry (publishedVersion)
- Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College (Bryn Mawr College) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Keywords
- student voice, educational reform, student rights, respect for students, listening to students, student agency, power in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review