Cited by 828Children's Rights and ParticipationHigher Education Practises and EngagementParticipatory Visual Research Methods

Sound, Presence, and Power: “Student Voice” in Educational Research and Reform

Cook-Sather, Alison·2006·Curriculum Inquiry

Abstract

Every way of thinking is both premised on and generative of a way of naming that reflects particular underlying convictions. Over the last 15 years, a way of thinking has reemerged that strives to reposition students in educational research and reform. Best documented in Australia, Canada, England, and the United States, this way of thinking is premised on the following convictions: that young people have unique perspectives on learning, teaching, and schooling; that their insights warrant not only the attention but also the responses of adults; and that they should be afforded opportunities to actively shape their education. Although these convictions mean different things to different people and take different forms in practice, a single term has emerged to capture a range of activities that strive to reposition students in educational research and reform: “student voice.” In this discussion the author explores the emergence of the term “student voice,” identifies underlying premises signaled by two particular words associated with the term, “rights” and “respect,” and explores the many meanings of a word that surfaces repeatedly across discussions of student voice efforts but refers to a wide range of practices: “listening.” The author offers this discussion not as an exhaustive or definitive analysis but rather with the goal of looking across discussions of work that advocates, enacts, and critically analyzes the term “student voice.”

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-873x.2006.00363.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Institute-level partnership schemes enhance student engagement and alter the established culture to provide more credence to the student voice.

    “There is compelling evidence suggesting that institute-level partnership schemes enhance student engagement and alter the established culture to provide more credence to the student voice (Cook-Sather, 2006; Cook-Sather, 2011).”

    From Assessment design through co-creation (2025) · cites this paper as Cook-Sather, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook-Sather, A.
Affiliations
Bryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr, PA, USA
Venue
Curriculum Inquiry
Published
2006-12
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
359-390
ISSN
  • 0362-6784 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-873X
OpenAlex
W2011380194
Cited by
828
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 26
FWCI
30.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Curriculum Inquiry (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College (Bryn Mawr College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
student voice, educational reform, student rights, respect for students, listening to students, student agency, power in education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review