The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Values, Framing, and Citizens’ Thoughts about Policy Issues: Effects on Content and Quantity
Abstract
This study examines how frames invoking a core value shape the content and quantity of citizens’ thoughts about a policy issue. An experimental study showed that exposure to a pro‐school voucher equality frame increased the probability that participants would invoke equality in their open‐ended survey responses. Exposure to an anti‐school voucher equality frame produced the same effect, as did exposure to both frames. At the same time, participants who received either frame or both frames provided fewer open‐ended responses. Thus, the frames appeared to focus participants’ thoughts on one value while reducing the overall extent to which they thought about the issue. In broader terms, value framing may have implications for the nature and quality of public deliberation about policy issues—a point that scholars should keep in mind when considering how to define and study framing effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785 · cited 4×
“Given that people judge frames in part by the credibility of their sources (Druckman, 2001a) and that credibility in politics is often defined in partisan terms (Zaller, 1992), our participants may have responded to the frames on the basis of not only their content but also their source cues.”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054 · Cited by 3,071
A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x · Cited by 1,159
Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R., Kashima, Y., & Crimston, C. R. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213478200 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K.
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-11-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 929-948
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9221
- OpenAlex
- W2055709386
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Values, Framing, and Citizens’ Thoughts about Policy Issues: Effects on Content and Quantity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00451.x
- The paper
- Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K. (2005). Values, Framing, and Citizens’ Thoughts about Policy Issues: Effects on Content and Quantity. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00451.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
