Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 66Social Policy and Reform StudiesIncome, Poverty, and InequalitySocial Issues and Policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Why Do People Stigmatise the Poor at a Time of Rapidly Increasing Inequality, and What Can Be Done About It?

Taylor‐Gooby, Peter·2013·The Political Quarterly

Abstract

This paper starts out from a puzzle. During the past thirty years, incomes have grown more unequal, a small group at the top has captured a much greater share of resources and poverty has increased. Despite this, most people are markedly less likely to want government to redistribute income or tackle poverty and are less sympathetic towards those without jobs. The greater insecurity of many people's lives in the current crisis renders the issue more perplexing. This paper describes trends in inequality, poverty and unemployment; presents new data on attitudes, media discussion and political platforms; discusses theoretical approaches from social psychologists, political scientists, sociologists and other commentators; and considers how a more generous welfare state might be pursued.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-923x.2013.02435.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Taylor‐Gooby, P.
Corresponding author
Taylor‐Gooby, Peter
Venue
The Political Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
31-42
ISSN
  • 0032-3179 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-923X
OpenAlex
W2017403528
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 2
FWCI
48.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Political Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Issues and Policies
Keywords
poverty stigma, income inequality, poverty, unemployment, public attitudes, redistribution, welfare state, media coverage of poverty, party platforms, economic insecurity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.