The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intelligent Policy Making for a Complex World: Pragmatism, Evidence and Learning
Abstract
The credentials of the evidence-based policy movement appear to be increasingly subject to challenge based on research that has highlighted the limits on the use of evidence in policy making. However, moves towards a more ‘realistic’ position of evidence-informed policy making risk conflating prescription with description and undermining a normative vision of better policy making. This article argues that we need to review the ideas that underpin our thinking about evidence-based policy making, and move beyond the territory of instrumental rationality to a position founded upon two intellectual pillars: our developing knowledge about complex adaptive systems; and ideas from a pragmatist philosophical position – especially those of John Dewey – about social scientific knowledge and its role in guiding action to address social problems. This leads us to a conception of ‘intelligent policy making’ in which the notion of policy learning is central.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature: Thirtieth-Anniversary Edition
RORTY, R. (2008) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvc77b6z · Cited by 4,927
Dewey, J. (1927) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 4,147
Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science
Anderson, P. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.216 · Cited by 2,118
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-5043 · Cited by 1,861
Smith, T. V., & Dewey, J. (1929) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2180172 · Cited by 1,849
Pawson, R. (2006) · doi:10.4135/9781849209120 · Cited by 1,791
Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions
Kooiman, J. (1993) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 1,582
Using evidenceHow research can inform public services
Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007) · Policy Press eBooks · doi:10.1332/policypress/9781861346650.001.0001 · Cited by 1,335
Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-2914 · Cited by 1,240
Rorty, R. M. (1999) · Cited by 1,216
Cited by
Anticipatory innovation governance: Shaping the future through proactive policy making
(2020) · OECD Working Papers on Public Governance · doi:10.1787/cce14d80-en · Cited by 303
Reale, E., Avramov, D., Canhial, K., Donovan, C., Flecha, R., Holm, P., Larkin, C., Lepori, B., Mosoni-Fried, J., Oliver, E., et al. (2018) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvx025 · Cited by 258
Parkhurst, J. (2016) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · doi:10.4324/9781315675008 · Cited by 756
What should teacher education be about? Initial comparisons from Scotland and Alberta
Adams, P., & Burns, A. (2023) · Teaching Education · doi:10.1080/10476210.2023.2166918 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanderson, I.
- Venue
- Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 699-719
- ISSN
- 0032-3217 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9248
- OpenAlex
- W2018254624
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intelligent Policy Making for a Complex World: Pragmatism, Evidence and Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00791.x
- The paper
- Sanderson, I. (2009). Intelligent Policy Making for a Complex World: Pragmatism, Evidence and Learning. Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00791.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
