Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 48Political Science Research and EducationInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationSocial Science and Policy Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interdisciplinarity and Political Science

Moran, Michael·2006·Politics
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00253.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

‘Interdisciplinarity’ is an ancient notion in the social sciences, but has acquired both pedagogic and policy popularity in recent decades. Paradoxically, it only makes sense in a disciplinary world. The disciplines have been greatly strengthened in recent decades, and interdisciplinarity can partly be understood as a response by interests threatened by disciplinarity. It is also a strategy used by disciplines in crisis, and by dissidents from disciplinary hierarchies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00253.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Economic and Social Research Council, 2005, Annual Report and Accounts, 92, 2004
  2. Chapman B., 1974, WJMM, Political Questions: Essays in Honour of W.J.M. Mackenzie
  3. Goodin R., 1995, A New Handbook of Political Science
  4. 10.5871/bacad/9780197262948.001.0001 · DOI
  5. Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE), 2003, Review of Research Assessment: Report by Sir Gareth Roberts to the UK Funding Bodies
  6. Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE), 2004, RAE2008: Initial Decisions by the UK Funding Bodies
  7. Higher Education Funding Council (HEFCE), 2005, RAE 2008: Guidance on Submissions
  8. Mackenzie W.J.M., 1967, Politics and Social Science
  9. 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2004.00216.x · DOI
  10. 10.1177/136787799800100105 · DOI
  11. 10.4324/9780203458563 · DOI
  12. Sloman A., 1964, A University in the Making

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Moran, M.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Moran, Michael
ORCID
Moran, Michael
Venue
Politics
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2006-05
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
73-83
ISSN
  • 0263-3957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9256
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00253.x
OpenAlex
W1971719369
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 11
FWCI
20.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Politics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
Keywords
interdisciplinarity, disciplinarity, political science, disciplinary hierarchy, academic disciplines, disciplinary crisis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.