The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intact Artificial Grammar Learning in Amnesia: Dissociation of Classification Learning and Explicit Memory for Specific Instances
Abstract
The present study investigates whether the ability to classify on the basis of rules can be learned independently of memory for the specific instances used to leach the rules. Thirteen amnesic patients and 14 control subjects studied letter strings generated by an artificial grammar. Subjects were then shown new letter strings and were instructed to classify them as grammatical or nongrammatical. Amnesic patients performed as well as normal subjects. However, amnesic patients performed more poorly than control subjects on a recognition test of the exemplars that had been presented. Amnesic patients also performed more poorly than control subjects when the instructions were to base the classification on explicit comparison with the original exemplars. The results show that classification learning based on exemplars of an artificial grammar can develop normally despite impaired memory for the exemplars themselves. Whereas exemplar memory depends on interactions between neocortex and the limbic system, classification learning may depend on interaction between neocortex and the neostriatum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & AU (1987) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5237.001.0001 · Cited by 3,315
Context theory of classification learning
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207 · Cited by 3,061
Cohen, N. J., & Squire, L. R. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7414331 · Cited by 2,296
Self-citationSynthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge?
Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.264 · Cited by 526
Cited by
Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195 · Cited by 5,376
Self-citationMcClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419 · Cited by 5,256
Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective
Squire, L. R. (2004) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.005 · Cited by 2,269
Self-citationStructure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory systems
Squire, L. R., & Zola, S. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.24.13515 · Cited by 1,327
Self-citationDeclarative and Nondeclarative Memory: Multiple Brain Systems Supporting Learning and Memory
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.232 · Cited by 1,282
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Knowlton, B. J., Ramus, S. J., & Squire, L. R.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 172-179
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2159105521
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intact Artificial Grammar Learning in Amnesia: Dissociation of Classification Learning and Explicit Memory for Specific Instances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00021.x
- The paper
- Knowlton, B. J., Ramus, S. J., & Squire, L. R. (1992). Intact Artificial Grammar Learning in Amnesia: Dissociation of Classification Learning and Explicit Memory for Specific Instances. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00021.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.