Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intact Artificial Grammar Learning in Amnesia: Dissociation of Classification Learning and Explicit Memory for Specific Instances

Knowlton, Barbara J., Ramus, Seth J., Squire, Larry R.·1992·Psychological Science

Abstract

The present study investigates whether the ability to classify on the basis of rules can be learned independently of memory for the specific instances used to leach the rules. Thirteen amnesic patients and 14 control subjects studied letter strings generated by an artificial grammar. Subjects were then shown new letter strings and were instructed to classify them as grammatical or nongrammatical. Amnesic patients performed as well as normal subjects. However, amnesic patients performed more poorly than control subjects on a recognition test of the exemplars that had been presented. Amnesic patients also performed more poorly than control subjects when the instructions were to base the classification on explicit comparison with the original exemplars. The results show that classification learning based on exemplars of an artificial grammar can develop normally despite impaired memory for the exemplars themselves. Whereas exemplar memory depends on interactions between neocortex and the limbic system, classification learning may depend on interaction between neocortex and the neostriatum.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00021.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Authors
Knowlton, B. J., Ramus, S. J., & Squire, L. R.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1992-05
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
172-179
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2159105521
Cited by
316
References
4
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intact Artificial Grammar Learning in Amnesia: Dissociation of Classification Learning and Explicit Memory for Specific Instances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00021.x
The paper
Knowlton, B. J., Ramus, S. J., & Squire, L. R. (1992). Intact Artificial Grammar Learning in Amnesia: Dissociation of Classification Learning and Explicit Memory for Specific Instances. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00021.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.