The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The ERN is a negative voltage deflection that is sensitive to error commission. It is maximal at frontocentral electrode sites, generated primarily by the anterior cingulate cortex and posterior cingulate cortex (Buzzell et al., 2017; Conte et al., 2023; Dehaene et al., 1994; Van Veen & Carter, 2002), and generally peaks within 100 ms following error commission.”
From Foster care intervention protects cognitive control skills in young adults exposed to institutional rearing (2026) · cites this paper as Dehaene et al., 1994
Citations
Cites
Reason, J. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139062367 · Cited by 5,108
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Falkenstein M., 1990, Psychological brain research, 192
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.3289116 · DOI
- 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90121-B · DOI
- Tucker D.M., Liotti M., Potts G.F., Russell G.S., Posner M.I. (in press) Spatiotemporal analysis of brain electrical fields Human Brain Mapping.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex
Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01483-2 · Cited by 6,259
Self-citationHolroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.679 · Cited by 4,027
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782
“Response errors on this task, which reflect a conflict between intention and behaviour, evoked an ERP component that has been localized to the AC”
BackgroundMacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1835 · Cited by 3,666
Metadata
- Authors
- Dehaene, S., Posner, M. I., & Tucker, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 303-305
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2004996944
- Cited by
- 1,255
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 73
- FWCI
- 10.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- error detection, error compensation, cognitive control, error monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
