Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes
Abstract
Disgust is a basic emotion characterized by revulsion and rejection, yet it is relatively unexamined in the literature on prejudice. In the present investigation, interpersonal-disgust sensitivity (e.g., not wanting to wear clean used clothes or to sit on a warm seat vacated by a stranger) in particular predicted negative attitudes toward immigrants, foreigners, and socially deviant groups, even after controlling for concerns with contracting disease. The mechanisms underlying the link between interpersonal disgust and attitudes toward immigrants were explored using a path model. As predicted, the effect of interpersonal-disgust sensitivity on group attitudes was indirect, mediated by ideological orientations (social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism) and dehumanizing perceptions of the out-group. The effects of social dominance orientation on group attitudes were both direct and indirect, via dehumanization. These results establish a link between disgust sensitivity and prejudice that is not accounted for by fear of infection, but rather is mediated by ideological orientations and dehumanizing group representations. Implications for understanding and reducing prejudice are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Specific emotions are elicited when a particular group is seen to pose a threat to the social and sexual order.
“Specific emotions are elicited when a particular group is seen to pose a threat to the social and sexual order (Hodson and Costello, 2007; Inbar et al., 2009).”
From “Real men in the battlefield”: a hybrid AI–discourse analysis of online homophobia and transphobia (2026) · cites this paper as Hodson and Costello, 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 497
- Authors
- Hodson, G., & Costello, K.
- Affiliations
- Brock University (CA)
- ORCID
- Hodson, Gordon
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 691-698
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2162624840
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 34.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- disgust sensitivity, prejudice, intergroup attitudes, attitudes toward immigrants, social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, dehumanization, ideological orientation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Orientation, Peer Group, Predictive Value of Tests, Prejudice, Rejection, Psychology, Social Dominance, Students, Dehumanization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review