The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives
Abstract
A central tenant of open innovation is free revealing of the detailed workings of novel products and services, so that others may use them, learn from them, and perhaps improve them as well. We explain that innovators frequently do freely reveal proprietary information and knowledge regarding both information-based products and physical products they have developed. We explain why free revealing can make good economic sense for innovators and for society as well. The article develops the case for free revealing in terms of a ‘private collective’ model of innovation incentives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
The Logic of Collective Action.
Golembiewski, R. T., & Olson, M. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091298 · Cited by 11,364
Journal of economic literature
Armstrong, J. S. (1996) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(96)88197-0 · Cited by 9,923
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
Arrow, K. J. (1962) · The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity · doi:10.1515/9781400879762-024 · Cited by 8,635
Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development
Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R., & Griliches, Z. (1987) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.2307/2534454 · Cited by 3,772
von Hippel, E. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001 · Cited by 3,768
Raymond, E. (1999) · Knowledge, Technology & Policy · doi:10.1007/s12130-999-1026-0 · Cited by 2,915
Остром, Э. (2010) · Public Administration Issues · doi:10.17323/1999-5431-2010-0-1-5-52 · Cited by 2,850
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003) · Hispana · Cited by 2,767
Frontiers in social movement theory
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-4117 · Cited by 2,559
Cited by
Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives
Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002 · Cited by 1,889
Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development
Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510375604 · Cited by 1,364
Open innovation: The next decade
West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001 · Cited by 872
Füller, J., Hutter, K., Wahl, J., Bilgram, V., & Tekic, Z. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121598 · Cited by 335
Copy, transform, combine: Exploring the remix as a form of innovation
Flath, C. M., Friesike, S., Wirth, M., & Thiesse, F. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-017-0043-9 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G.
- Venue
- R and D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-306
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W2021270290
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 21.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00435.x
- The paper
- von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2006). Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives. R and D Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00435.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
