The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling Income Processes with Lots of Heterogeneity
Abstract
All empirical models of earnings processes in the literature assume a good deal of homogeneity. In contrast to this we model earnings processes allowing for lots of heterogeneity between agents. We also introduce an extension to the linear ARMA model that allows that the initial convergence to the long run may be different from that implied by the conventional ARMA model. This is particularly important for unit root tests which are actually tests of a composite of two independent hypotheses. We fit our models to a variety of statistics including most of those considered by previous investigators. We use a sample drawn from the PSID, and focus on white males with a high school degree. Despite this observable homogeneity we find much greater latent heterogeneity than previous investigators. We show that allowance for heterogeneity makes substantial differences to estimates of model parameters and to outcomes of interest. Additionally we find strong evidence against the hypothesis that any worker has a unit root.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Engle, R. F. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912773 · Cited by 20,795
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Cited by
Split-panel Jackknife Estimation of Fixed-effect Models
Dhaene, G., & Jochmans, K. (2015) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdv007 · Cited by 417
What Do Data on Millions of U.S. Workers Reveal About Lifecycle Earnings Dynamics?
Guvenen, F., Karahan, F., Ozkan, S., & Song, J. (2021) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta14603 · Cited by 282
Panel Experiments and Dynamic Causal Effects: A Finite Population Perspective
Bojinov, I., Rambachan, A., & Shephard, N. (2021) · Quantitative Economics · doi:10.3982/qe1744 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- BROWNING, M., EJRNAES, M., & ALVAREZ, J.
- Venue
- Review of Economic Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-08-13
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1353-1381
- ISSN
- 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161781848
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling Income Processes with Lots of Heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2010.00612.x
- The paper
- BROWNING, M., EJRNAES, M., & ALVAREZ, J. (2010). Modelling Income Processes with Lots of Heterogeneity. Review of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2010.00612.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.