Cited by 74Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMind wandering and attentionDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Differentiating between ADHD sub‐types on CCPT measures of sustained attention and vigilance

EGELAND, JENS, JOHANSEN, SUSANNE NORDBY, UELAND, TORILL·2009·Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The aim of the study was to test whether sustained attention and vigilance, often considered as the same phenomenon, dissociate on the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test, and whether subjects with ADHD‐Inattentive type and ADHD‐Combined type differ with regard to these measures. Sixty‐five healthy controls and 67 subjects with ADHD between 9 and 16 years of age participated in the study. The ADHD‐I group performed below control children on Hit Reaction Time Block Change, considered to measure sustained attention and the ADHD‐C group scored below controls on Hit Reaction Time Inter‐Stimulus‐Interval, considered to measure vigilance. Comparing the two clinical groups showed a test by group interaction, with ADHD‐I subjects performing below ADHD‐C subjects with regard to sustained attention and above ADHD‐C subjects with regard to vigilance. Sustained attention on the CCPT correlated specifically with parent and teacher ratings of inattention, but not with ratings of hyperactivity‐impulsivity, while vigilance correlated with all symptom ratings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00717.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deficits in each of the seven domains have been described for individuals with ADHD.

    “Deficits in each of these domains have been described for individuals with ADHD (e.g. Selective Attention [20], Sustained Attention [21], Response Precision [22], Cognitive Flexibility [23], Working Memory [24], Temporal Information Processing [15], Response Inhibition [13]).”

    From Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention (2017) · cites this paper as [21]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
EGELAND, J., JOHANSEN, S. N., & UELAND, T.
Affiliations
Sykehuset i Vestfold (NO)
Corresponding author
EGELAND, JENS
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-09
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
347-354
ISSN
  • 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9450
OpenAlex
W2169177172
Cited by
74
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
ADHD subtypes, ADHD inattentive type, combined type ADHD, sustained attention, Conners' Continuous Performance Test, reaction time, inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Arousal, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Norway, Case-Control Studies, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review