The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Possible Food Economies: a Methodological Framework for Exploring Food Production–Consumption Relationships
Open accessAbstract
Modes of food production–consumption defined as ‘alternative’ have received considerable academic attention, with studies exploring both their potential for contributing to rural development strategies and the opportunities they provide for countering established power relations in food supply systems. However, the use of the term ‘alternative’ as part of a persistent dualism in which it is opposed to the ‘conventional’ is problematic as it loses sight of the specificity of different examples food production–consumption. Based on extensive field research with a series of very different food projects, this article develops a methodological framework which structures a description of how specific examples of food production–consumption are organised with reference to a series of analytical fields. This framework retains a sense of the diversity and particularity of particular cases of production–consumption, and directs attention to the particular locations of resistance to prevalent power relations in food systems that are made possible through different food projects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Callon, M. (1984) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1984.tb00113.x · Cited by 7,763
(2018) · Collected Fictions · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1bkm5kc.100 · Cited by 4,811
Renting, H., Marsden, T. K., & Banks, J. (2003) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a3510 · Cited by 1,985
Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces
Whatmore, S. (2002) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446219713 · Cited by 1,936
The end of capitalism (as we knew it): a feminist critique of political economy
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3976 · Cited by 1,527
Food Supply Chain Approaches: Exploring their Role in Rural Development
Marsden, T., Banks, J., & Bristow, G. (2000) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00158 · Cited by 1,210
Should we go “home” to eat?: toward a reflexive politics of localism
DuPuis, E. M., & Goodman, D. (2005) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.05.011 · Cited by 1,066
Embeddedness, the new food economy and defensive localism
Winter, M. (2003) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/s0743-0167(02)00053-0 · Cited by 914
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5191 · Cited by 878
Murdoch, J., Marsden, T., & Banks, J. (2000) · Economic Geography · doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2000.tb00136.x · Cited by 749
Cited by
The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas
Jarosz, L. (2008) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.10.002 · Cited by 653
Chiffoleau, Y., & Dourian, T. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12239831 · Cited by 212
Sustainable food planning: evolving theory and practice
Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2012) · doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-187-3 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Holloway, L., Kneafsey, M., Venn, L., Cox, R., Dowler, E., & Tuomainen, H.
- Venue
- Sociologia Ruralis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0038-0199 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9523
- OpenAlex
- W1989033934
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 47.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Possible Food Economies: a Methodological Framework for Exploring Food Production–Consumption Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00427.x
- The paper
- Holloway, L., Kneafsey, M., Venn, L., Cox, R., Dowler, E., & Tuomainen, H. (2007). Possible Food Economies: a Methodological Framework for Exploring Food Production–Consumption Relationships. Sociologia Ruralis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00427.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.