Cited by 97Rural development and sustainabilityRural Development and AgricultureAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Activating the Countryside: Rural Power, the Power of the Rural and the Making of Rural Politics

Bell, Michael M., Lloyd, Sarah E., Vatovec, Christine·2010·Sociologia Ruralis

Abstract

Against the current moment of rural doubt, we argue that the material, symbolic and relational practices of the rural continue to be articulate aspects of our politics. We term the material practices ‘rural power’ and the symbolic practices ‘the power of the rural’. The relational practices we term ‘rural constituencies’ when relations are bounded materially and ‘constituencies of the rural’ when they are bounded symbolically. We apply this framework to a critique of contemporary theory, especially mobilities research, which, we argue, typically speaks with a passive rural voice. We argue for recognising the active rural voice in the mobilisation and stabilisation of the rural.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00512.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such marginality underlines the need for clear protagonism of farmers along the coproduction of urban or metropolitan food policies, and an adapted methodological approach and accompaniment work in order to recreate 'rural power'.

    “Such marginality underline the need of a clear protagonism of farmers along the coproduction of urban or metropolitan food policies, and an adapted methodological approach and accompanyment work in order to recreate the 'rural power' (Bell et al. 2010).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bell, M. M., Lloyd, S. E., & Vatovec, C.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bell, Michael M.
  • Lloyd, Sarah E.
  • Vatovec, Christine
Venue
Sociologia Ruralis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-11
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
205-224
ISSN
  • 0038-0199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9523
OpenAlex
W2110678754
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
18.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociologia Ruralis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Rural development and sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rural Development and Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
rural power, rural politics, symbolic practices, material practices, relational practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review