Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 115Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesWorkplace Violence and Bullying

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

4. The Safety Dance: Confronting Harassment, Intimidation, and Violence in the Field

Sharp, Gwen, Kremer, Emily·2006·Sociological Methodology
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2006.00183.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper discusses how gender dynamics may put female researchers at risk of harassment or even violence from participants, research assistants, or bystanders when conducting fieldwork. Based on a review of the existing literature on fieldwork safety, as well as the authors' own experiences interviewing male participants, the authors argue that attention to protecting subjects of research has led the social science community to largely ignore the possibility that in some cases, researchers themselves may be at risk. The paper concludes with suggested strategies for increasing researcher safety during data collection, as well as a call for issues of fieldwork safety to be more openly discussed by supervisors, professors, advisors, and others who guide novice researchers through the fieldwork process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2006.00183.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gill Fiona, 2002, Sociologial Research Online, 7

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sharp, G., & Kremer, E.
Affiliations
  • Southern Utah University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Sharp, Gwen
ORCID
Sharp, Gwen
Venue
Sociological Methodology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2006-08
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
317-327
ISSN
  • 0081-1750 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9531
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-9531.2006.00183.x
OpenAlex
W2055476260
Cited by
103
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Sociological Methodology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
researcher safety, harassment, intimidation, violence, gender dynamics, female researchers, fieldwork safety, research assistants, bystanders, research participant protection, novice researchers, supervision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.