Cited by 259Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyRisk Perception and ManagementMisinformation and Its Impacts

‘Trusting blindly can be the biggest risk of all’: organised resistance to childhood vaccination in the UK

Open access
Hobson‐West, Pru·2007·Sociology of Health & Illness

Abstract

Sociological interest in vaccination has recently increased, largely in response to media coverage of concerns over the safety of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine. The resulting body of research highlights the importance of risk and trust in understanding parental and professional engagement with vaccination. To date, only limited attention has been paid to organised parental groups that campaign against aspects of vaccination policy. This paper reports findings from a qualitative study of contemporary groups in the UK, and develops three main lines of argument. First, these actors are best analysed as ‘Vaccine Critical groups’ and include Radical and Reformist types. Second, Vaccine Critical groups discursively resist vaccination through a reframing that constructs risk as unknown and non‐random. Third, trust as faith is negatively contrasted with the empowerment that is promised to result from taking personal responsibility for health and decision‐making. Whilst representing a challenge to aspects of vaccination policy, this study confirms that the groups are involved in the articulation and promotion of other dominant discourses. These findings have implications for wider sociological debates about risk and trust in relation to health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00544.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vaccine concerns and resistance have been previously tied to the critical approach to public understanding of science by Hobson-West and Leach and Fairhead.

    “Vaccine concerns and resistance have been previously tied to this critical approach to public understanding of science by Hobson-West (2003; 2007) and Leach and Fairhead (2007).”

    From Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy (2016) · cites this paper as Hobson-West 2007

  • Parent advocacy groups like JABS engage parents on their own terms.

    “Parent advocacy groups like JABS, on the other hand, engage parents on their own terms.”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hobson‐West, P.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Hobson‐West, Pru
Venue
Sociology of Health & Illness
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
198-215
ISSN
  • 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9566
OpenAlex
W2081434432
Cited by
259
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sociology of Health & Illness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Leverhulme Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
childhood immunization, anti-vaccine movement, risk perception, parental resistance, vaccination policy, reframing, personal responsibility for health, health discourse
MeSH terms
Child, Consumer Organizations, Decision Making, United Kingdom, Health Policy, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Parents, Perception, Politics, Treatment Refusal, Immunization Programs, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine, Dissent and Disputes, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review