The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptualising body work in health and social care
Open accessAbstract
Body work is a central activity in the practice of many workers in the field of health and social care. This article provides an introduction to the concept of body work – paid work on the bodies of others – and demonstrates its importance for understanding the activities of health and social care workers. Providing an overview of existing research on body work, it shows the manifold ways in which this can inform the sociology of health and illness – whether through a micro‐social focus on the inter‐corporeal aspects of work in health and social care, or through elucidating our understanding of the times and spaces of work, or through highlighting the relationship between mundane body work and the increasingly global movements of bodies, workers and those worked‐upon. The article shows how understanding work undertaken on the bodies of others as ‘body work’ provides a mechanism for relating work in the sphere of health and social care to that in other sectors, opening up new avenues for research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo
McCormack, W., & Douglas, M. (1967) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384077 · Cited by 5,752
Douglas, M. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203361832 · Cited by 5,078
Volatile bodies: toward a corporeal feminism
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-3246 · Cited by 2,946
Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo.
Ardener, E., & Douglas, M. (1967) · Man · doi:10.2307/2798681 · Cited by 2,811
(2003) · Cited by 2,717
Shilling, C. (2003) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446215470 · Cited by 2,391
Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism
Flavis, L. A. D., & Grosz, E. (1995) · Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature · doi:10.2307/1347941 · Cited by 1,775
Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour
Stasiulis, D., & Anderson, B. (2002) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/3089475 · Cited by 1,257
Medical tourism: Sea, sun, sand and … surgery
Connell, J. (2006) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2005.11.005 · Cited by 1,037
Zelizer, V. A. (2000) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2000.tb00162.x · Cited by 1,006
Cited by
Mechanisms of invisibility: rethinking the concept of invisible work
Hatton, E. (2017) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017016674894 · Cited by 308
Reno, J. (2015) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014146 · Cited by 305
Wilkinson, S., & Wilkinson, C. (2020) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13174 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Twigg, J., Wolkowitz, C., Cohen, R. L., & Nettleton, S.
- Venue
- Sociology of Health & Illness
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-188
- ISSN
- 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9566
- OpenAlex
- W1948161179
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 29.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualising body work in health and social care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01323.x
- The paper
- Twigg, J., Wolkowitz, C., Cohen, R. L., & Nettleton, S. (2011). Conceptualising body work in health and social care. Sociology of Health & Illness. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01323.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.