Cited by 107Organ Donation and TransplantationEthics and bioethics in healthcareAnthropological Studies and Insights

IMPOSSIBLE GIFTS: BODIES, BUDDHISM AND BIOETHICS IN CONTEMPORARY SRI LANKA

Open access
Simpson, Bob·2004·Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

Abstract

The ethical concerns generated by transactions in human tissue touch on fundamental ideas of the body, society, and the nature of giving. These issues have generally been discussed using Euro‐American terms of reference. Drawing on fieldwork carried out in Sri Lanka, this article describes the ways in which a distinctively Theravāda Buddhist notion of giving and charity has been linked to the development of strategies to encourage the donation of human tissue. Eye and blood donation are used as illustrations of the linkages that have been forged between religious duty, other‐wordly aspirations, and nationalist sentiment in the development of national donation services. The key question which is then addressed is how these distinctive beliefs and values inform attempts to frame donations of sperm and ova which are now beginning to take place in Sri Lanka. In religious and cultural terms the candidacy of sperm and ova as gifts appears to be evaluated very differently. Explaining these differences opens up the possibility of a more thoroughgoing anthropological critique of bioethics and the manner of its diffusion both within and beyond the Euro‐American context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2004.00214.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altruistic yet unconventional gifts such as blood, tissue, organ, and body donation raise new ethical issues in both Western and non-Western societies.

    “These altruistic yet unconventional gifts also raise new ethical issues in both Western and non-Western societies (Bolt 2012;Simpson 2004).”

    From Gifts (2020) · cites this paper as Simpson 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simpson, B.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Simpson, Bob
Venue
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
839-859
ISSN
  • 1359-0987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9655
OpenAlex
W2134668610
Cited by
107
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
Keywords
tissue donation, bioethics, Theravada Buddhism, eye donation, blood donation, sperm donation, religious obligation, nationalism, critique of bioethics, body, Sri Lanka

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review