IMPOSSIBLE GIFTS: BODIES, BUDDHISM AND BIOETHICS IN CONTEMPORARY SRI LANKA
Open accessAbstract
The ethical concerns generated by transactions in human tissue touch on fundamental ideas of the body, society, and the nature of giving. These issues have generally been discussed using Euro‐American terms of reference. Drawing on fieldwork carried out in Sri Lanka, this article describes the ways in which a distinctively Theravāda Buddhist notion of giving and charity has been linked to the development of strategies to encourage the donation of human tissue. Eye and blood donation are used as illustrations of the linkages that have been forged between religious duty, other‐wordly aspirations, and nationalist sentiment in the development of national donation services. The key question which is then addressed is how these distinctive beliefs and values inform attempts to frame donations of sperm and ova which are now beginning to take place in Sri Lanka. In religious and cultural terms the candidacy of sperm and ova as gifts appears to be evaluated very differently. Explaining these differences opens up the possibility of a more thoroughgoing anthropological critique of bioethics and the manner of its diffusion both within and beyond the Euro‐American context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Altruistic yet unconventional gifts such as blood, tissue, organ, and body donation raise new ethical issues in both Western and non-Western societies.
“These altruistic yet unconventional gifts also raise new ethical issues in both Western and non-Western societies (Bolt 2012;Simpson 2004).”
From Gifts (2020) · cites this paper as Simpson 2004
Cites
The Gift, the Indian Gift and the 'Indian Gift'
Parry, J. (1986) · Man · doi:10.2307/2803096 · Cited by 826 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Indeed, as Parry (1986) suggests, careful consideration of the local idioms through which ideas of gift, charity, and the body are expressed are crucial.”
BackgroundLaidlaw, J. (2000) · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · doi:10.1111/1467-9655.00036 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundations, Values and Issues
Harvey, P. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511800801 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
The Consecration of a Buddhist Image
Gombrich, R. (1966) · The Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.2307/2051829 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yan, Y. (2020) · Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology · doi:10.29164/20gifts · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Simpson, B.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Simpson, Bob
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 839-859
- ISSN
- 1359-0987 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9655
- OpenAlex
- W2134668610
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Keywords
- tissue donation, bioethics, Theravada Buddhism, eye donation, blood donation, sperm donation, religious obligation, nationalism, critique of bioethics, body, Sri Lanka
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review