The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Representational vs conjectural divination: innovating out of nothing in Mongolia
Abstract
Divination is often regarded as a practice undertaken to obtain a standardized, best possible result. This characterization is made at the cost of analysing how people obtain desired innovations through divinatory procedures. To show how divination actually forces people to adopt strategies that lead to innovation, this article classifies all forms of divination into ‘representational’ or ‘conjectural’ categories. Drawing on Mongolian ethnography, the article argues that in conjectural divinations repeated questioning links known impossibilities to prospective possibilities, producing the basis for innovations which initially appear to arise out of nothing. The article demonstrates how conjectural divinations initiate processes of innovation wherein repeated questioning leads to combinatory thought which imposes novel combinations on people, who perceive the need for innovation, access an innovation, and finally recursively posit that innovation’s conceptual origins.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies of fate as it pertains to divination in anthropology have often focused on its (apparent) immutable character, mandated by cosmic, divine, or scriptural authority.”
From Four Pillars and Four Diviners: Fate, Fluidity, and Invention in Horoscopic Saju Divination in Contemporary South Korea (2019) · cites this paper as Swancutt 2006
Citations
Cites
The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion
Boyer, P. (1994) · doi:10.1525/9780520911628 · Cited by 780
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.2307/2801815 · DOI
- Bawden C.R., 1994, Confronting the supernatural: Mongolian traditional ways and means, collected papers, 161
- Beattie J., 1967, Magic, witchcraft and curing, 211
- 10.1017/CBO9780511896866.008 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-1807-2 · DOI
- 10.1525/9780520340565 · DOI
- Csikszentmihályi M., 1990, Flow: the psychology of optimal experience
- Diemberger H., 1993, Gendered anthropology, 88
- 10.4324/9780203361832 · DOI
- Dulam B., 2002, Mongol böögiin zan üil (Mongol shamanic ritual)
- Empson R.2003.Integrating transformations: a study of children and daughters‐in‐law in a new approach to Mongolian kinship. Ph.D. thesis University of Cambridge.
- Evans‐Pritchard E.E., 1976, Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande
- 10.4324/9780203392850 · DOI
- Galdanova G.R., 1987, Dolamaiskiye verovaniya Buryat (Pre‐lamaist beliefs of the Buryat)
- 10.3167/015597704782352555 · DOI
- Humphrey C., 1995, The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space
- 10.1093/oso/9780198279419.001.0001 · DOI
- Kapadia K., 1995, Siva and her sisters: gender caste and class in rural south India, 92
- Lévi‐Strauss C., 1968, Structural anthropology (trans. C. Jacobson & B.G. Schoepf), 206
- Lévi‐Strauss C., 1969, The elementary structures of kinship (trans. J.H. Bell, J.R. von Sturmer & R. Needham)
- Lewis D., 1973, Counterfactuals
- Mackie J.L., 1974, The cement of the universe: a study of causation
- Mikhailov T.M., 1980, Iz istorii Buryatskogo shamanizma, s drevneishikh vremen po XVIII v (On the history of Buryat shamanism, from the earliest times to the eighteenth century)
- Mikhailov T.M., 1987, Buryatskii shamanizm: istoriya, struktura i sotsialnye funktsii (Buryat shamanism: history, structure and social functions)
- Park G., 1967, Magic, witchcraft and curing, 233
- Parkin D., 1991, African divination systems: ways of knowing, 173
- Puri J., 1999, Woman, body, desire in post‐colonial India: narratives of gender and sexuality, 75
- Schutz A., 1971, Collected papers II: studies in social theory
- Sperber D., 1975, Rethinking symbolism (trans. A.L.Morton)
- 10.7591/9781501717192 · DOI
- Wagner R., 1986, Symbols that stand for themselves
- 10.1525/aa.1973.75.5.02a00140 · DOI
- 10.2307/2803659 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kim, D. J. (2019) · Journal of Korean Religions · doi:10.1353/jkr.2019.0007 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Swancutt, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Swancutt, Katherine
- ORCID
- Swancutt, Katherine
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-26
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 331-353
- ISSN
- 1359-0987 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9655
- OpenAlex
- W2064272669
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 12.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
- Keywords
- divination, innovation, Mongolian ethnography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Representational vs conjectural divination: innovating out of nothing in Mongolia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00294.x
- The paper
- Swancutt, K. (2006). Representational vs conjectural divination: innovating out of nothing in Mongolia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00294.x