The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking observational cinema
Abstract
‘Observational cinema’ has long been central to debates in visual anthropology. Although initially hailed as a radical breakthrough in ethnographic filmmaking, the genre was subsequently criticized as naïvely empiricist and lacking in reflexive sophistication. In this article, we make a new case for observational cinema. It grows out of a renewed attention to practice. We argue that observational work be understood not as preliminary to anthropological proper but as a distinctive form of anthropology in its own right. Résumé: Le « cinéma d'observation » est depuis longtemps un sujet de controverse dans l'anthropologie visuelle. Saluéà ses débuts comme une révolution dans l'acquisition d'images ethnographiques, le genre a été critiqué par la suite comme entaché d'un empirisme naïf et dépourvu d'élaboration réflexive. Les auteures plaident ici pour le cinéma d'observation, à partir d'une attention renouvelée pour cette pratique. Elles demandent que le travail d'observation soit considéré non pas comme un préliminaire au travail anthropologique proprement dit, mais comme une forme distincte d'anthropologie à part entière.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.4135/9780857020284 · DOI
- Bazin A., 1967, What is cinema?
- Bazin A., 1972, What is cinema?
- Bruzzi S., 2000, New documentary: a critical introduction
- Dineen M., 2003, The documentary makers: interviews with 15 of the best in the business, 22
- Fabian J., 1983, Time and the other: how anthropology makes its other
- Grasseni C., 2004, Working images: methods and media in ethnographic research, 15
- 10.3167/9781845452100 · DOI
- Grimshaw A., 2009, Observational cinema: anthropology, film and the exploration of social life, 10.2979/5899.0 · DOI
- Henley P., 2004, Working images: methods and media in ethnographic research, 109
- Herzfeld M., 2004, The body impolitic: artisans and artifice in the global hierarchy of value
- Herzfeld M., 2007, Ways of knowing: new approaches in the anthropology of knowledge and learning, 91
- 10.4324/9780203466025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2979/5260.0 · DOI · Paper page
- Lawrence D.H., 1950, Selected essays, 307
- Loizos P., 1997, Rethinking visual anthropology, 81
- MacDougall D., 1995, Principles of visual anthropology, 115, 10.1515/9783110290691.115 · DOI
- MacDougall D., 1998, Transcultural cinema
- MacDougall D., 2006, The corporeal image: film, ethnography and the senses
- Nichols B., 1991, Representing reality: issues and concepts in documentary
- 10.1080/0014184020042643 · DOI
- Ravetz A.2001.Vision knowledge and the invention of place in an English town. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis University of Manchester.
- Ruby J., 2000, Picturing culture: explorations of film and anthropology
- Sandall R., 1972, Observation and identity, Sight and Sound, 41, 192
- 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00484.x · DOI
- Stewart S., 2005, The open studio: essays on art and aesthetics
- 10.9783/9780812203134 · DOI
- Taussig M., 1993, Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses
- 10.1515/9783110290691.99 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Grimshaw, A., & Ravetz, A.
- Affiliations
- Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Grimshaw, Anna
- Ravetz, Amanda
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-08-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 538-556
- ISSN
- 1359-0987 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9655
- OpenAlex
- W2046957723
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (publishedVersion)
- e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema and Media Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema History and Criticism
- Keywords
- observational cinema, ethnographic filmmaking, visual anthropology, reflexivity, empiricism, ethnographic observation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review