Cited by 29Indian and Buddhist StudiesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BUDDHISM AND SCIENCE: HOW FAR CAN THE DIALOGUE PROCEED?

Open access
Jinpa, Thupten·2010·Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science

Abstract

On the stage of the religion‐and‐science dialogue, Buddhism, especially Tibetan Buddhism, is a late arrival. However, thanks primarily to the long‐standing personal interest of the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan tradition he represents has come to engage deeply with various disciplines of modern science. This essay follows the active engagement that has occurred particularly in the form of the biannual Mind and Life dialogues between the Dalai Lama and scientists. From the perspective of an active participant, I present the careful deliberations that ensure constructive parameters for these dialogues so that no one side can exert a hegemonic voice. I explore the challenges that are likely to confront the Buddhist side from its encounter with science, particularly with respect to its worldview. I identify specific areas where the two sides can and do engage in concrete collaboration, especially with respect to investigating healthy qualities of the mind and the effects of conscious mental training for attention and emotion regulation. Finally, I explore the question of the possible impact of this dialogue on modern science.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01138.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. “Buddhism and Science: On the Nature of the Dialogue.”
  2. “Philosophical Theories of Consciousness: Asian Perspectives.”
  3. “Science as an Ally or a Rival Philosophy? Tibetan Buddhist Thinkers’ Engagement with Modern Science.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Jinpa, T.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Jinpa, Thupten
Venue
Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science
Published
2010-12-02
Volume
45
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0591-2385 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9744
OpenAlex
W2101348020
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
32.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zygon® (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Keywords
Buddhism and science, Tibetan Buddhism, Dalai Lama, dialogue between science and religion, Buddhist worldview, mental training, attention, emotion regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review