Should Expatriates Vote?*
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Being entitled to just treatment by other groups when our interests are at stake is different from being entitled to participate in their decision-making processes.
“being entitled to just treatment by other groups whenever our interests are at stake is quite different from being entitled to participate in the decisionmaking processes of those groups”
From Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem (2020) · cites this paper as López-Guerra (2005, p. 223)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Expansive Citizenship—Voting beyond Territory and Membership
Bauböck, R. (2005) · PS: Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096505050341 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem
Miller, D. (2020) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12707 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lopez-Guerra, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Philosophy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 216-234
- ISSN
- 0963-8016 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9760
- OpenAlex
- W2161000329
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 28.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Political Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- expatriates, voting rights, citizenship, political participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review