Cited by 310Political Philosophy and EthicsDiaspora, migration, transnational identityElectoral Systems and Political Participation

Should Expatriates Vote?*

Lopez-Guerra, Claudio·2005·Journal of Political Philosophy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being entitled to just treatment by other groups when our interests are at stake is different from being entitled to participate in their decision-making processes.

    “being entitled to just treatment by other groups whenever our interests are at stake is quite different from being entitled to participate in the decisionmaking processes of those groups”

    From Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem (2020) · cites this paper as López-Guerra (2005, p. 223)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez-Guerra, C.
Venue
Journal of Political Philosophy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
216-234
ISSN
  • 0963-8016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9760
OpenAlex
W2161000329
Cited by
310
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 16
FWCI
28.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Political Philosophy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Diaspora, migration, transnational identity
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
expatriates, voting rights, citizenship, political participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review