Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SMC2: An Efficient Algorithm for Sequential Analysis of State Space Models

Chopin, N., Jacob, P. E., Papaspiliopoulos, O.·2013·Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology

Abstract

Summary: We consider the generic problem of performing sequential Bayesian inference in a state space model with observation process y, state process x and fixed parameter θ. An idealized approach would be to apply the iterated batch importance sampling algorithm of Chopin. This is a sequential Monte Carlo algorithm in the θ-dimension, that samples values of θ, reweights iteratively these values by using the likelihood increments pyt∣y1:t−1,θ and rejuvenates the θ-particles through a resampling step and a Markov chain Monte Carlo update step. In state space models these likelihood increments are intractable in most cases, but they may be unbiasedly estimated by a particle filter in the x-dimension, for any fixed θ. This motivates the SMC2 algorithm that is proposed in the paper: a sequential Monte Carlo algorithm, defined in the θ-dimension, which propagates and resamples many particle filters in the x-dimension. The filters in the x-dimension are an example of the random weight particle filter. In contrast, the particle Markov chain Monte Carlo framework that has been developed by Andrieu and colleagues allows us to design appropriate Markov chain Monte Carlo rejuvenation steps. Thus, the θ-particles target the correct posterior distribution at each iteration t, despite the intractability of the likelihood increments. We explore the applicability of our algorithm in both sequential and non-sequential applications and consider various degrees of freedom, as for example increasing dynamically the number of x-particles. We contrast our approach with various competing methods, both conceptually and empirically through a detailed simulation study, and based on particularly challenging examples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2012.01046.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Chopin, N., Jacob, P. E., & Papaspiliopoulos, O.
Venue
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
Published
2012-10-12
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
397-426
ISSN
  • 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9868
OpenAlex
W1876120984
Cited by
338
References
40
FWCI
19.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SMC2: An Efficient Algorithm for Sequential Analysis of State Space Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2012.01046.x
The paper
Chopin, N., Jacob, P. E., & Papaspiliopoulos, O. (2013). SMC2: An Efficient Algorithm for Sequential Analysis of State Space Models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2012.01046.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.