The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Useful Distribution for Fitting Discrete Data: Revival of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson Distribution
Open accessAbstract
Summary: A useful discrete distribution (the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution) is revived and its statistical and probabilistic properties are introduced and explored. This distribution is a two-parameter extension of the Poisson distribution that generalizes some well-known discrete distributions (Poisson, Bernoulli and geometric). It also leads to the generalization of distributions derived from these discrete distributions (i.e. the binomial and negative binomial distributions). We describe three methods for estimating the parameters of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution. The first is a fast simple weighted least squares method, which leads to estimates that are sufficiently accurate for practical purposes. The second method, using maximum likelihood, can be used to refine the initial estimates. This method requires iterations and is more computationally intensive. The third estimation method is Bayesian. Using the conjugate prior, the posterior density of the parameters of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution is easily computed. It is a flexible distribution that can account for overdispersion or underdispersion that is commonly encountered in count data. We also explore two sets of real world data demonstrating the flexibility and elegance of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson distribution in fitting count data which do not seem to follow the Poisson distribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression, with an Application to Defects in Manufacturing
Lambert, D. (1992) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269547 · Cited by 3,988
Cited by
Lord, D., & Mannering, F. (2010) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2010.02.001 · Cited by 1,759
Exponential-family random graph models for valued networks
Krivitsky, P. N. (2012) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/12-ejs696 · Cited by 295
Wang, J., & Zhang, G. (2011) · Journal of Transportation Safety & Security · doi:10.1080/19439962.2011.591518 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Shmueli, G., Minka, T. P., Kadane, J. B., Borle, S., & Boatwright, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-10-22
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-142
- ISSN
- 0035-9254 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9876
- OpenAlex
- W2149161954
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Useful Distribution for Fitting Discrete Data: Revival of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson Distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00474.x
- The paper
- Shmueli, G., Minka, T. P., Kadane, J. B., Borle, S., & Boatwright, P. (2005). A Useful Distribution for Fitting Discrete Data: Revival of the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson Distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00474.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.