The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Usage‐Based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis
Abstract
Constituent structure is considered to be the very foundation of linguistic competence and often considered to be innate, yet we show here that it is derivable from the domain‐general processes of chunking and categorization. Using modern and diachronic corpus data, we show that the facts support a view of constituent structure as gradient (as would follow from its source in chunking and categorization) and subject to gradual changes over time. Usage factors (i.e., repetition) and semantic factors both influence chunking and categorization and, therefore, influence constituent structure. We take as our example the complex prepositions of English, for instance, on top of, in back of, and in spite of, whose internal constituent structure has been much debated. From observing strong (but not absolute) usage trends in the corpus data, we find that these complex preposition sequences display varying degrees of emerging constituency. We conclude that constituent reanalysis, like language change generally, proceeds gradually.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar
Winters, M. E., & Langacker, R. W. (1988) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327796 · Cited by 5,665
Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 · Cited by 5,659
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5376 · Cited by 4,207
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316423530 · Cited by 4,136
Bybee, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526 · Cited by 3,488
Self-citationFoundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution
Jackendoff, R. (2002) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 · Cited by 3,244
From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition
Bybee, J. (2006) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0186 · Cited by 2,786
Self-citationThe Cambridge Grammar of the English Language
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2005) · Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik · doi:10.1515/zaa-2005-0209 · Cited by 2,408
Bybee, J. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612886 · Cited by 2,400
Self-citation
Cited by
Bybee, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526 · Cited by 3,488
Self-citationImplicit AND explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity
Ellis, N. C. (2015) · Studies in Bilingualism · doi:10.1075/sibil.48.01ell · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Beckner, C., & Bybee, J.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11-24
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 27-46
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2125241952
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 338.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Usage‐Based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00534.x
- The paper
- Beckner, C., & Bybee, J. (2009). A Usage‐Based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00534.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.