AN OLD‐NEW CONCEPT OF CONVEX RISK MEASURES: THE OPTIMIZED CERTAINTY EQUIVALENT
Abstract
The optimized certainty equivalent (OCE) is a decision theoretic criterion based on a utility function, that was first introduced by the authors in 1986. This paper re‐examines this fundamental concept, studies and extends its main properties, and puts it in perspective to recent concepts of risk measures. We show that the negative of the OCE naturally provides a wide family of risk measures that fits the axiomatic formalism of convex risk measures. Duality theory is used to reveal the link between the OCE and the ϕ‐divergence functional (a generalization of relative entropy), and allows for deriving various variational formulas for risk measures. Within this interpretation of the OCE, we prove that several risk measures recently analyzed and proposed in the literature (e.g., conditional value of risk, bounded shortfall risk) can be derived as special cases of the OCE by using particular utility functions. We further study the relations between the OCE and other certainty equivalents, providing general conditions under which these can be viewed as coherent/convex risk measures. Throughout the paper several examples illustrate the flexibility and adequacy of the OCE for building risk measures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The general class of OCE risks includes standard measures such as the expected loss, the entropic risk, and the CVaR.
“In this work, we consider the general class of OCE risks, which include standard measures such as the expected loss, the entropic risk, and the CVaR (see Table II).”
From Optimized Certainty Equivalent Risk-Controlling Prediction Sets (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buehler, H., Gonon, L., Teichmann, J., & Wood, B. (2019) · Quantitative Finance · doi:10.1080/14697688.2019.1571683 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Optimized Certainty Equivalent Risk-Controlling Prediction Sets
Huang, J., Farzaneh, A., & Simeone, O. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.13660
“This motivates the need for optimized certainty equivalent (OCE) risk measures [9], which provide a flexible framework for controlling risk aversion through measures such as conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) and entropic risk.”
- Authors
- Ben‐Tal, A., & Teboulle, M.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Teboulle, Marc
- ORCID
- Teboulle, Marc
- Venue
- Mathematical Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06-27
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 449-476
- ISSN
- 0960-1627 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9965
- OpenAlex
- W1976406849
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mathematical Finance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Probability and Risk Models
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
- Keywords
- convex risk measures, risk measures, certainty equivalent, utility functions, duality theory, phi-divergence, Kullback-Leibler divergence, conditional value at risk, coherent risk measures, variational formula
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review