The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Political History of Federal Mental Health and Addiction Insurance Parity
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: This article chronicles the political history of efforts by the U.S. Congress to enact a law requiring "parity" for mental health and addiction benefits and medical/surgical benefits in private health insurance. The goal of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity (MHPAE) Act of 2008 is to eliminate differences in insurance coverage for behavioral health. Mental health and addiction treatment advocates have long viewed parity as a means of increasing fairness in the insurance market, whereas employers and insurers have opposed it because of concerns about its cost. The passage of this law is viewed as a legislative success by both consumer and provider advocates and the employer and insurance groups that fought against it for decades. METHODS: Twenty-nine structured interviews were conducted with key informants in the federal parity debate, including members of Congress and their staff; lobbyists for consumer, provider, employer, and insurance groups; and other key contacts. Historical documentation, academic research on the effects of parity regulations, and public comment letters submitted to the U.S. Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury before the release of federal guidance also were examined. FINDINGS: Three factors were instrumental to the passage of this law: the emergence of new evidence regarding the costs of parity, personal experience with mental illness and addiction, and the political strategies adopted by congressional champions in the Senate and House of Representatives. CONCLUSIONS: Challenges to implementing the federal parity policy warrant further consideration. This law raises new questions about the future direction of federal policymaking on behavioral health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Forty-five states enacted some form of parity law, although different conditions, benefits, and employer groups were included in each of the mandates (Sturm & Pacula, 1999). Notably, only five states included SUD benefits in their parity laws (Barry, Huskamp, & Goldman, 2010).”
From The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act evaluation study: Impact on specialty behavioral healthcare utilization and spending among enrollees with substance use disorders (2017) · cites this paper as Barry, Huskamp, & Goldman, 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Before MHPAEA, state and federal attempts to improve equity of employer-sponsored BH coverage did not match MHPAEA's inclusivity of SUD benefits.”
From The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act evaluation study: Impact on specialty behavioral healthcare utilization and spending among enrollees with substance use disorders (2017) · cites this paper as Barry, Huskamp, & Goldman, 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yackee, S. W. (2005) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui042 · Cited by 315
(1993) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.150.10.1447 · Cited by 297
Administrative Procedures and Political Control of the Bureaucracy
Balla, S. J. (1998) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2585488 · Cited by 285
Costs And Use Of Mental Health Services Before And After Managed Care
Goldman, W., McCulloch, J., & Sturm, R. (1998) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.40 · Cited by 228
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Treatment in Managed Care: the Massachusetts Medicaid Experience
Callahan, J. J., Shepard, D. S., Beinecke, R. H., Larson, M. J., & Cavanaugh, D. A. (1995) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.14.3.173 · Cited by 219
Behavioral health insurance parity for federal employees
Goldman, H. H., Frank, R. G., Burnam, M. A., Huskamp, H. A., Ridgely, M. S., Normand, S.-L. T., Young, A. S., Barry, C. L., Azzone, V., Busch, A. B., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa053737 · Cited by 219
Self-citationCosts And Incentives In A Behavioral Health Carve-Out
Albert, C., & McGuire, T. G. (1998) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.53 · Cited by 171
The demand for ambulatory mental health services from specialty providers.
Horgan, C. M. (1986) · PubMed · Cited by 129
The Role of Group Interest, Identity, and Stigma in Determining Mental Health Policy Preferences
McSween, J. L. (2002) · Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law · doi:10.1215/03616878-27-5-773 · Cited by 102
Handbook on mental health policy in the United States
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6026 · Cited by 93
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Bachman, 1996, An Actuarial Analysis of the Domenici-Wellstone Amendment to S.1028 “Health Insurance Reform Act” to Provide Parity for Mental Health Benefits under Group and Individual Insurance Plans
- Butler, 2000, ERISA Preemption Manual for State Health Policy Makers
- Coalition for Parity, 2010, Coalition for Parity, Inc., v. Kathleen Sebelius, the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda L. Solis, the United States Department of Labor, Timothy F. Geithner, and the United States Department of the Treasury
- Congressional Record 2007 S1864-5. Daily edition, February 12, 153
- Horgan, 1986, The Demand for Ambulatory Mental Health Services, Health Services Research, 21, 291
- Laudicina, 2000, State Legislative Health Care and Insurance Issue: 2000 Survey of Plans
- McGuire, 1981, Financing Psychotherapy: Cost, Effects and Public Policy
- NAMHC (National Advisory Mental Health Council), 1997, Parity in Coverage of Mental Health Services in an Era of Managed Care: An Interim Report to Congress by the National Advisory Mental Health Council
- NAMHC (National Advisory Mental Health Council), 1998, Parity in Financing Mental Health Services: Managed Care Effects on Cost, Access and Quality. An Interim Report to Congress
- NAMHC (National Advisory Mental Health Council), 2000, Insurance Parity for Mental Health: Cost, Access, and Quality. Final Report to Congress
- RWJF (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation), 2001, Estimating the Costs of Parity for Mental Health: Methods and Evidence
- Scheffler, 1985, Mental Health Services: New Policies and Estimates, Generations: Quarterly Journal of the American Society on Aging, 9, 33
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 1982 National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in Medium and Large Size Firms, 1981. Bulletin 2140
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2007 National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in Private Industry in the United States, 2005. Bulletin 2589
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Mental Illness Stigma on Seeking and Participating in Mental Health Care
Corrigan, P. W., Druss, B. G., & Perlick, D. A. (2014) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100614531398 · Cited by 1,642
A Handbook for the Study of Mental Health Second Edition
Scheid, T. L., & Brown, T. N. (2009) · Cited by 1,320
Rosenfield, S., & Mouzon, D. M. (2012) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_14 · Cited by 592
Integrated mental health services in China: challenges and planning for the future
Liang, D., Mays, V. M., & Hwang, W. (2017) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czx137 · Cited by 331
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2012) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_25 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- BARRY, C. L., HUSKAMP, H. A., & GOLDMAN, H. H.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- BARRY, COLLEEN L.
- Venue
- Milbank Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-09-22
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 404-433
- ISSN
- 0887-378X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2950754
- OpenAlex
- W2160959952
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Milbank Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080797, R01MH093414)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA026414)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- mental health parity, private health insurance, legislative politics, lobbying, mental illness, addiction treatment, health policy implementation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Income, Insurance, Health, Interviews as Topic, Mental Health, Politics, Social Justice, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Substance-Related Disorders, Health Status Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
