The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: Cognitive theories of metaphor understanding are typically described in terms of the mappings between different kinds of abstract, schematic, disembodied knowledge. My claim in this paper is that part of our ability to make sense of metaphorical language, both individual utterances and extended narratives, resides in the automatic construction of a simulation whereby we imagine performing the bodily actions referred to in the language. Thus, understanding metaphorical expressions like ‘grasp a concept’ or ‘get over’ an emotion involve simulating what it must be like to engage in these specific activities, even though these actions are, strictly speaking, impossible to physically perform. This process of building a simulation, one that is fundamentally embodied in being constrained by past and present bodily experiences, has specific consequences for how verbal metaphors are understood, and how cognitive scientists, more generally, characterize the nature of metaphorical language and thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196313 · Cited by 2,361
Hearing Sounds, Understanding Actions: Action Representation in Mirror Neurons
Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umiltà, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070311 · Cited by 1,801
Cited by
The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters.
Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0021446 · Cited by 894
Mapping the brain's metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason
Lakoff, G. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958 · Cited by 335
Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: A framework for embodied semantics
Fernandino, L., Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Pendl, S. L., Humphries, C. J., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv020 · Cited by 305
Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading.
Koopman, E. M. (. (2016) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/aca0000041 · Cited by 110
Osypiuk, K., Thompson, E., & Wayne, P. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00174 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- GIBBS, R. W.
- Venue
- Mind <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Language
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 434-458
- ISSN
- 0268-1064 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0017
- OpenAlex
- W1968310932
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x
- The paper
- GIBBS, R. W. (2006). Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. Mind <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Language. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.