Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New technology and industrial relations

Clark, Jon·1989·New Technology, Work and Employment
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-005x.1989.tb00099.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article reviews recent studies of new technology and industrial relations and indicates four main areas for future research. The author concludes that more attention should be devoted to the technology itself, and that industrial relations research could usefully incorporate many recent insights and developments in industrial sociology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-005x.1989.tb00099.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Bright J., 1958, Automation and Management, 6
  2. Butera F., 1984, Automation and Work Design, 125
  3. McLoughlin I., 1988, Technological Change at Work
  4. Willman P., 1987, New Technology and Industrial Relations: A Review of the Literature
  5. Clark J., 1988, The Process of Technological Change‐ New Technology and Social Choice in the Workplace
  6. Winner L., 1977, Autonomous Technology
  7. Hyman R., 1988, New Technology and Industrial Relations, 7
  8. Bessant J., 1983, Information Technology in Manufacturing Processes, 26
  9. Gill C., 1985, Work, Unemployment and New Technology
  10. Wood S. (ed.) The Degradation of Work?: Skill Deskilling and the Labour Process Hutchinson 1982; Winch G. 1983 op. cit.; Warner M. (ed.) Microprocessors Manpower and Society Gower 1984; Piercy N. (ed.) The Management Implications of New Information Technology UWIST/Croom Helm London 1984; Marstrand P. (ed.) New Technology and the Future of Work and Skill Frances Pinter London 1984; Mackenzie and Wajcman 1985 op cit.; Rhodes E. and Wield D. (eds) Implementing New Technologies Blackwell 1985; Knights D. and Willmott H. (eds) New Technology and the Labour Process Macmillan 1987.
  11. Forester T., 1980, The Microelectronics Revolution
  12. OUP 1965; 2nd edition OUP 1980.
  13. Liverpool University Press 1956.
  14. Northcott J., 1982, Microelectronics in Industry: Survey Statistics
  15. 1987, Workplace Industrial Relations and Technical Change
  16. Marginson P., Beyond the Workplace: Managing Industrial Relations in Large Enterprises
  17. Review of Recent Organisational Behaviour Literature on New Technology, 35
  18. Jones B. ‘Distribution or Redistribution of Engineering Skills? The Case of Numerical Control’ in Wood 1982 op. cit pp.179–200; Wilkinson B. The Shopfloor Politics of New Technology Heinemann 1983; Sorge A. Hart‐mann G. Warner M. Nicholas I. Microelectronics and Manpower in Manufacturing Gower 1983.
  19. Arnold E. andSenker P. Designing the Future‐the Implications of CAD Interactive Graphics for Employment and Skills in the British Engineering Industry EITB Watford 1982; Winstanley D. and Francis A. Redrawing the Line—Changing Design Practices in Engineering Firms Paper presented at 1987 BSA Conference University of Leeds; McLoughlin I. ‘Management Strategies for the Introduction and Control of Interactive Computer Graphics Systems’ in Rader M. Wingert B. and Riehm U. (eds.) Social Science Research on CAD/CAM Physica‐Verlag Heidelberg 1988 pp. 133–43. · DOI
  20. Kaplinsky R., 1982, Computer Aided Design: Electronics, Comparative Advantage and Development
  21. 10.1007/978-1-349-17477-5 · DOI
  22. Child J. Loveridge R. Harvey J.Spencer A. ‘Microelectronics and the Quality of Employment in Services’ in Marstrand 1984 op. cit. pp.163–90; Davies A. Industrial Relations and New Technology Croom Helm 1986.
  23. Martin R., 1981, New Technology and Industrial Relations in Fleet Street
  24. Mumford E., 1983, Designing Secretaries
  25. Jones B. 1982 op. cit; Wood S. and Manwaring T. ‘The Ghost in the Labour Process’ in Knights D. Willmott H. Collinson D. (eds.) Job Redesign Gower 1985 pp. 171–96.
  26. Buchanan D., 1983, Organisations in the Computer Age
  27. Rothwell S. ‘Company Employment Policies and New Technology in Manufacturing and Service Sectors’ in Warner 1984 op. cit. pp.111–33.
  28. Senker P. ‘Training for Automation’ in Warner 1984 op. cit. pp.134–46.
  29. Cockburn C., 1985, Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men and Technical Know‐How
  30. Williams R. andMoseley R. Technology Agreements Paper presented to EEC‐FAST Conference London 1982; Rush H. and Williams R. ‘Consultation and Change: New Technology and Manpower in the Electronics Industry’ in Warner 1984 op. cit. pp. 171–88; Williams R. and Steward F. ‘New Technology Agreements: An Assessment’ Industrial Relations Journal 16(3) 1985 pp. 58–73. · DOI
  31. Price R. ‘Information Consultation and the Control of New Technology’ in Hyman and Streeck 1988 op. cit. pp.249–62; Batstone E. and Gourlay S. Unions Unemployment and Innovation Blackwell 1986; Moore R. and Levie H. ‘New Technology and the Unions’ in Forester 1985 op. cit. pp. 511–27; Batstone E. Gourlay S. Moore R. and Levie H. New Technology and the Process of Labour Regulation OUP 1987.
  32. For discussion see Willman 1987 op. cit. pp.7–8.
  33. SeeBuchananandBoddy 1983 op. cit.: also Buchanan D. ‘Technological Imperatives and Strategic Choice’ in Winch 1983 op. cit. pp.72–80.
  34. SeeMcLoughlinandClark 1988 op. cit. pp.6770.
  35. SeeArnoldandSenker op. cit; also Carnall C and Medland A. ‘Computer‐Aided‐Design: Social and Technical Choices for Development’ in Warner 1984 op. cit. pp.49–65.
  36. See Clarket al. 1988 op. cit. pp.31–2.
  37. 1987 op. cit. pp.7–10.
  38. See Legge 1985 op. cit. pp.33ff. for discussion.
  39. 10.1111/j.1468-2338.1984.tb00491.x · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0305-0483(85)90023-4 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1467-8543.1987.tb00723.x · DOI
  42. Batstoneet al. 1987 op. cit. pp.183–4.
  43. 10.1111/j.1468-005X.1987.tb00069.x · DOI
  44. see also Rothwell S. 'Supervisors and New Technology' in Rhodes and Wield 1985 op. cit. pp. 374-83
  45. Dawson P. and McLoughlin I. 'Organisational Choice in the Redesign of Supervisory Systems' in Boddy D. and Buchanan D. (eds.) The New Management Challenge Croom Helm 1988 pp. 99-110. · DOI
  46. The New Management Challenge; see alsoMcLoughlinandClark 1988 op. cit. pp.61–3 146–51 for discussion.
  47. SeeMcLoughlinandClark 1988 pp.195–203.
  48. 1988, The Road to Nissan

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Clark, J.
Venue
New Technology, Work and Employment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
5-17
ISSN
  • 0268-1072
  • 1468-005X
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-005x.1989.tb00099.x
Cited by
6
References
0
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 6639 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.