The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pushing back the frontiers: management control and work intensification under JIT/TQM factory regimes
Abstract
Drawing on primary and secondary sources the authors argue that the JIT/TQM manufacturing system intensifies work as a result of increased surveillance and monitoring of workers' activities, heightened responsibility and accountability, the harnessing of peer pressure within ‘teams' and via ‘customers', and the fostering of ‘involvement’ in waste elimination and the continuous improvement of the production process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THAT'S NOT MY JOB: DEVELOPING FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE WORK.
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Jackson, P. R. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256952 · Cited by 447
Parker, S. K. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.620 · Cited by 438
Samuel, D., Found, P., & Williams, S. J. (2015) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2013-0555 · Cited by 146
Lean production assessed by Karasek's job demand-job control model
Schouteten, R., & Benders, J. (2004) · Economic and Industrial Democracy · doi:10.1177/0143831x04044831 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Delbridge, R., Turnbull, P., & Wilkinson, B.
- Venue
- New Technology, Work and Employment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-106
- ISSN
- 0268-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-005X
- OpenAlex
- W2079957374
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
