A survey of oil demand elasticities for developing countries
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of the existing literature has attempted to estimate the oil demand elasticity from dynamic reduced-form models that do not distinguish between oil demand and oil supply shocks.
“First, much of the existing literature has attempted to estimate the oil demand elasticity from dynamic reduced-form models that do not distinguish between oil demand and oil supply shocks (see, for example, Dahl, 1993; Cooper, 2003).”
From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Dahl, 1993
Surveys by Dahl (1993) and Cooper (2003) report oil demand elasticity estimates between -0.05 and -0.07.
“For example, surveys by Dahl (1993) and Cooper (2003) report estimates between À0.05 and À0.07.”
From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Dahl (1993)
Conventional estimates of the short-run price elasticity of oil demand from dynamic reduced-form regressions, as in Dahl (1993) and Cooper (2003), ignored the endogeneity of the real price of oil, causing the elasticity estimate to be downward biased.
“One problem is that conventional estimates of this elasticity from dynamic reduced-form regressions, as in Dahl (1993) and Cooper (2003), have ignored the endogeneity of the real price of oil, causing the elasticity estimate to be downward biased.”
From THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL (2014) · cites this paper as Dahl (1993)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE ROLE OF INVENTORIES AND SPECULATIVE TRADING IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR CRUDE OIL
Kilian, L., & Murphy, D. P. (2014) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.2322 · Cited by 1,481 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dahl, C.
- Affiliations
- Colorado School of Mines (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dahl, Carol
- ORCID
- Dahl, Carol
- Venue
- OPEC Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 399-420
- ISSN
- 0277-0180 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0076
- OpenAlex
- W2082159934
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- OPEC Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
- Physical Sciences › Energy › General Energy › Global Energy Security and Policy
- Keywords
- oil demand, price elasticity, developing countries, demand elasticity, oil consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
