The DOI matches its Crossref record.
KANT'S FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW
Open accessAbstract
Philosophy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Self-Legislation in Kant's Moral Philosophy
Kain, P. P. (2004) · Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie · doi:10.1515/agph.2004.86.3.257 · Cited by 186
Reath, A. (1994) · Noûs · doi:10.2307/2215474 · Cited by 121
“For further discussion of the interpretation of the Categorical Imperative procedure see Onora O'Neill (1989, chs. 5-7); Christine M. Korsgaard (1985); and, especially, Barbara Herman, "Moral Deliberation and the Derivation of Duties" and "Leaving Deontology Behind", in Herman (1993).”
MethodPatten, A. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0199251568.001.0001 · Cited by 99
Kaufman, A. (1999) · doi:10.1093/0198294670.001.0001 · Cited by 90
Lenz, H. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4087-8 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Korsgaard, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Korsgaard, Christine M.
- Venue
- Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 24-47
- ISSN
- 0031-5621 (ISSN-L)
- 0279-0750
- 1468-0114
- OpenAlex
- W2143592913
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Locations
- Pacific philosophical quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Historical Thought
- Keywords
- Immanuel Kant, universal law, categorical imperative, ethics, Kantian ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
