The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators
Abstract
In an effort to improve the small sample properties of generalized method of mo-ments (GMM) estimators, a number of alternative estimators have been suggested. These include empirical likelihood (EL), continuous updating, and exponential tilt-ing estimators. We show that these estimators share a common structure, being members of a class of generalized empirical likelihood (GEL) estimators. We use this structure to compare their higher order asymptotic properties. We find that GEL has no asymptotic bias due to correlation of the moment functions with their Jacobian, eliminating an important source of bias for GMM in models with endo-geneity. We also find that EL has no asymptotic bias from estimating the optimal weight matrix, eliminating a further important source of bias for GMM in panel data models. We give bias corrected GMM and GEL estimators. We also show that bias corrected EL inherits the higher order property of maximum likelihood, that it is higher order asymptotically efficient relative to the other bias corrected estimators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Using Heteroscedasticity to Identify and Estimate Mismeasured and Endogenous Regressor Models
Lewbel, A. (2012) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.2012.643126 · Cited by 2,712
An MCMC approach to classical estimation
Chernozhukov, V., & Hong, H. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00100-3 · Cited by 758
Estimation with weak instruments: Accuracy of higher‐order bias and MSE approximations
Hahn, J., Hausman, J., & Kuersteiner, G. (2004) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1368-423x.2004.00131.x · Cited by 332
Inverse probability tilting for moment condition models with missing data
Graham, B. S., De Xavier Pinto, C. C., & Egel, D. (2012) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdr047 · Cited by 174
The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization
Davies, N. M., von Hinke Kessler Scholder, S., Farbmacher, H., Burgess, S., Windmeijer, F., & Smith, G. D. (2015) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6358 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Newey, W., & Smith, R. J.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-255
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0262
- OpenAlex
- W2100169259
- Cited by
- 805
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 61.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00482.x
- The paper
- Newey, W., & Smith, R. J. (2004). Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00482.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.