The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Confidence Intervals for Partially Identified Parameters
Abstract
In the last decade a growing body of research has studied inference on partially identified parameters (e.g., Manski, 1990, 2003). In many cases where the parameter of interest is realvalued, the identification region is an interval whose lower and upper bounds may be estimated from sample data. Confidence intervals may be constructed to take account of the sampling variation in estimates of these bounds. Horowitz and Manski (1998, 2000) proposed and applied interval estimates that asymptotically cover the entire identification region with fixed probability. Here we introduce conceptually different interval estimates that asymptotically cover each element in the identification region with fixed probability (but not necessarily every element simultaneously). We show that these two types of interval estimate are different in practice, the latter in general being shorter. The difference in length (in excess of the length of the identification set itself) can be substantial, and in large samples is comparable to the difference of one and twosided confidence intervals. A complication arises from the fact that the simplest version of the proposed interval is discontinuous in the limit case of point identification, leading to coverage rates that are not uniform in important subsets of the parameter space. We develop a modification depending on the width of the identification region that restores uniformity. We show that under some conditions, using the estimated width of the identification region instead of the true width maintains uniformity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences Models
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00668.x · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationPartial Identification of Probability Distributions
(2003) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b97478 · Cited by 698
Self-citation
Cited by
Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation
Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.1.5 · Cited by 4,926
Self-citationIdentification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences Models
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00668.x · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationEstimating Dynamic Models of Imperfect Competition
Bajari, P., Benkard, C. L., & Levin, J. (2007) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00796.x · Cited by 836
Manski, C. F., & Pepper, J. V. (2018) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00689 · Cited by 158
Self-citationCygan‐Rehm, K., Kuehnle, D., & Oberfichtner, M. (2017) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3510 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Imbens, G. W., & Manski, C. F.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1845-1857
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0262
- OpenAlex
- W2159026487
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confidence Intervals for Partially Identified Parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00555.x
- The paper
- Imbens, G. W., & Manski, C. F. (2004). Confidence Intervals for Partially Identified Parameters. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00555.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.