The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Section Regression with Common Shocks
Open accessAbstract
This paper considers regression models for cross-section data that exhibit cross-section dependence due to common shocks, such as macroeconomic shocks. The paper analyzes the properties of least squares (LS) estimators in this context. The results of the paper allow for any form of cross-section dependence and heterogeneity across population units. The probability limits of the LS estimators are determined, and necessary and sufficient conditions are given for consistency. The asymptotic distributions of the estimators are found to be mixed normal after recentering and scaling. The t, Wald, and F statistics are found to have asymptotic standard normal, χ2, and scaled χ2 distributions, respectively, under the null hypothesis when the conditions required for consistency of the parameter under test hold. However, the absolute values of t, Wald, and F statistics are found to diverge to infinity under the null hypothesis when these conditions fail. Confidence intervals exhibit similarly dichotomous behavior. Hence, common shocks are found to be innocuous in some circumstances, but quite problematic in others. Models with factor structures for errors and regressors are considered. Using the general results, conditions are determined under which consistency of the LS estimators holds and fails in models with factor structures. The results are extended to cover heterogeneous and functional factor structures in which common factors have different impacts on different population units.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data
Donald, S. G., & Lang, K. (2007) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.89.2.221 · Cited by 1,324
Cited by
Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects
(2009) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta6135 · Cited by 1,690
Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data
Donald, S. G., & Lang, K. (2007) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.89.2.221 · Cited by 1,324
The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters
MacKinnon, J. G., & Webb, M. D. (2018) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1111/ectj.12107 · Cited by 317
Time-Varying Risk Premium in Large Cross-Sectional Equity Data Sets
Gagliardini, P., Ossola, E., & Scaillet, O. (2016) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta11069 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, D. W. K.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1551-1585
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0262
- OpenAlex
- W2145351609
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Section Regression with Common Shocks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00629.x
- The paper
- Andrews, D. W. K. (2005). Cross-Section Regression with Common Shocks. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00629.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.