The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Making of the English Working Class?
Abstract
A real confrontation aity open conflict between scholars is a purgative experience', according to the Times Literary Supplement.2 Purgative perhaps, especially for the contestants, but also enlightening, especially for those who try to assess the evidence used and conclusions established in the confrontation. The two most interesting, lively and probably most important recent debates among British historians are those concerned with the gentry in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and with the labouring poor during the industrial revolution. This latter debate, also, has spilled over into economics where a main pre-occupation is economic growth (of which the English industrial revolution is an interesting example), and into 'the new history' with its interests in social and cultural change, stimulated by Marxism, sociology and a revolt against the dullness and irrelevance of much traditional history. Some of the main controversialists in 'the standard-of-living debate' have come from the fringes of the established academic world, from areas remote from agreed courses and acceptable topics; their work, criticized as polemical, is certainly spirited, even aggressive. And although for scholars passion is not necessarily a good master, it is a great inspiration. Mr Thompson has been inspired to write a big book widely acclaimed by reviewers and already the subject of serious academic discussion. This review of the book does not aim to cover all the issues raised by Mr Thompson, but examines his main theses, his use of evidence, his theories of class and revolution and his analyses of Methodism and the standard-of-living, and tries to assess his importance in the historiography of the English industrial revolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., Boselie, P., Lee Cooke, F., Decker, S., DeNisi, A., et al. (2023) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12524 · Cited by 908
Dimaggio, P. (1982) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/016344378200400104 · Cited by 783
First World Political Ecology: Lessons from the Wise Use Movement
McCarthy, J. (2002) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a3526 · Cited by 373
Northward Migration and the Rise of Racial Disparity in American Incarceration, 1880–1950
Muller, C. (2012) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/666384 · Cited by 178
Group Pleasures: Collaborative Commitments, Shared Narrative, and the Sociology of Fun
Fine, G. A., & Corte, U. (2017) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275117692836 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- CURRIE, R., & HARTWELL, R. M.
- Venue
- The Economic History Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1965-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 633-643
- ISSN
- 0013-0117 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0289
- OpenAlex
- W2085954578
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Making of the English Working Class? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1965.tb01761.x
- The paper
- CURRIE, R., & HARTWELL, R. M. (1965). The Making of the English Working Class? The Economic History Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1965.tb01761.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.