The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Male and female living standards in England and Wales, 1812‐1867: evidence from criminal height records1
Abstract
Paul Johnson, Stephen Nicholas, Male and Female Living Standards in England and Wales, 1812-1857: Evidence From Criminal Height Records, The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 48, No. 3 (Aug., 1995), pp. 470-481
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They conclude that”
From The Historical Background of the Communist Manifesto (1998) · cites this paper as Johnson and Nicholas (1995)
In the citing paper
“Johnson and Nicholas (1995) found that males born between 1840 and 1857, and females born between 1845 and 1857, were significandy shorter than those born between 1812 and 1825, even when occupation and location are controlled for.”
From The Historical Background of the Communist Manifesto (1998) · cites this paper as Johnson and Nicholas (1995)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Historical Background of the Communist Manifesto
Boyer, G. R. (1998) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.12.4.151 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- JOHNSON, P., & NICHOLAS, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- The Economic History Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 470-481
- ISSN
- 0013-0117 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0289
- OpenAlex
- W2111955209
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Economic History Review (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval and Early Modern Justice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Keywords
- living standards, gender differences, criminal records, mortality, 19th century, England and Wales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
