Cited by 21Historical Economic and Social StudiesInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementMigration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rickman revisited: the population growth rates of English counties in the early modern period1

WRIGLEY, E. A.·2009·The Economic History Review

Abstract

In the 1830s, Rickman, who had supervised the taking of the first four censuses, secured additional returns of baptisms, burials, and marriages from all Anglican incumbents whose registers began early. He made use of the returns to produce new estimates of the population of each county from the sixteenth century onwards. His estimates were published in the 1841 census after his death and have been very widely quoted ever since. This article presents new county estimates, taking advantage of the fact that it is now possible to avoid some of the logical difficulties that Rickman encountered because independent estimates of national population totals are now available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00476.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Deane P., 1962, British economic growth, 1688–1959: trends and structure
  2. Ebdon D., 2001, Statistics in geography
  3. Flinn M. W. British population growth 1700–1850(1970). · DOI
  4. Glass D. V., 1973, Numbering the people. The eighteenth century population controversy and the development of census and vital statistics in Britain
  5. Glass D. V., 1973, The population controversy
  6. Hatcher J., 1993, The history of the British coal industry
  7. 10.1017/CBO9780511895494 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/0032472031000146996 · DOI
  9. Oeppen J., 1993, Old and new methods in historical demography, 29
  10. 10.1017/CBO9780511522802 · DOI
  11. Wrigley E. A., 1987, People, cities and wealth: the transformation of traditional society
  12. 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2006.00355.x · DOI
  13. 10.1017/CBO9780511660344 · DOI
  14. Wrigley E. A.andSchofield R. S. The population history of England 1541–1871: a reconstruction paperback edn. with new intro. (Cambridge 1989).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
WRIGLEY, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
WRIGLEY, E. A.
Venue
The Economic History Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-07
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
711-735
ISSN
  • 0013-0117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0289
OpenAlex
W2163025480
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Economic History Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
Keywords
population growth rate, English counties, early modern period, parish registers, 1841 census, historical demography, population estimates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rickman revisited: the population growth rates of English counties in the early modern period1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00476.x
The paper
WRIGLEY, E. A. (2009). Rickman revisited: the population growth rates of English counties in the early modern period1. The Economic History Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00476.x